no matter hw bad or gud d person s, there r still people who r more than willing to testify where were they (or she) when BAI was murdered, she could have been released by now... If u were to consider guys, during the arraignment, the lawyer was focussing on the technicalities and LEGALITIES? rather than defense of his clients involvement?
?
Y wud a lawyer claimed on INVASION of PRIVACY??? when the boarding house is not privately owned by his client and 1 mor thing, the owner herself confessed that the said boarder had not rented d place for months already and yet, she is still in d place???
To be honest, when a lawyer finds his client to be responsible, the nearest thing he can do, as a defense (for he is receiving payment from his client to defend him or her), especially if the case was sensationalized, IS TO GO POLITICAL.
Meaning, he will question the legality of his client's arrest,
the manner by which the arrest was effected, did the police able to say the miranda warning to the accused, such other matters that will, in the end, relieve his client from the crime.
This part is also crucial, for once the manner was wrong sa pagdakop, ang pag-execute sa mga police unsay sulod sa warrant of arrest, etc. mapawalang bisa man ang pagdakop, so matechnical ang mga police. the bottomline of this is that: PRESERVATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED.
Linkback:
https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=17574.0