As of February 2014, the Philippines had not yet submitted a written pleading to ITLOS, and it was reported that China had offered mutual withdrawal from the shoal and other inducements if the Philippines would refrain from submitting a formal pleading, and that the Philippine position was, “With what's on the table, there's not enough.â€
as of 30 march 2014, the philippines has submitted a memorial in its case against china.
Defying China’s warnings, the Philippines on Sunday pressed ahead with the submission of a crucial arbitration document packed with evidence and legal arguments seeking to invalidate China’s massive claim over the South China Sea.
Ignoring a possible backlash from China, the Philippine government transmitted the document, called a “memorial†in international arbitration parlance, to the Netherlands-based Permanent Court of Arbitration where a five-member tribunal operating under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea will hear Manila’s complaint.
“Today, the Philippines submitted its memorial to the arbitral tribunal that is hearing the case it brought against the People’s Republic of China under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,†Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario told a news conference.
“With firm conviction, the ultimate purpose of our memorial is our national interest.â€
Manila declined to release a copy of the memorial as it has yet to be reviewed by the court.
But Del Rosario said the document consists of “ten volumes with maps†with “nearly 4,000 pages†and will fortify the Philippine case, which seeks to declare China’s claim as illegal. A hard copy will be forwarded to the tribunal on Monday.
The document, he said, “contains the Philippine analysis of the applicable law and the relevant evidence, and demonstrates that the arbitral tribunal has jurisdiction over all the claims made by the Philippines.â€
It will be used by the tribunal to determine if the Philippine case has legal merit under international law, and if the court has jurisdiction over it, Del Rosario said.
“Every claim is meritorious,†he said. “It sets out the specific relief sought by the Philippines in regard to each of its claims, and shows why it is entitled to such relief.â€
“It is about seeking not just any kind of resolution but a just and durable solution grounded on international law,†he added. (
http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/, march 30 2014)
Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=78278.0