Author Topic: Atty Vitaliano Aguirre Cited for Contempt at the Impeachment Trial  (Read 2261 times)

MikeLigalig.com

  • FOUNDER
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 33321
  • Please use the share icons below
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Tickets on a Budget

Atty Vitaliano Aguirre has been cited for contempt for not listening the rant of Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago


Sen Miriam Defensor-Santiago calls the prosecution team, composed of lawyers and congressmen, "gago."

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=47882.0
John 3:16-18 ESV
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son (Jesus Christ), that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.

👉 GET easy and FAST online loan at www.tala.com Philippines

Book tickets anywhere for planes, trains, boats, bus at www.12go.co

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Lorenzo

  • SUPREME COURT
  • THE LEGEND
  • *****
  • Posts: 54226
  • Be the change you want to see in the world...
    • View Profile
Re: Atty Vitaliano Aguirre Cited for Contempt at the Impeachment Trial
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2012, 03:35:19 AM »
dali ma suko ni si Senator Defensor. aww, ilongga man diay.

na suko siya ni mr. aguirre kai nag suplado lagi.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=47882.0
www.trip.com - Hassle-free planning of your next trip

islander

  • SUPREME COURT
  • THE LEGEND
  • *****
  • Posts: 46867
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Travel Tickets
Re: Atty Vitaliano Aguirre Cited for Contempt at the Impeachment Trial
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2012, 12:17:38 PM »
the ears have it! ;D

from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/:

“I charge this private prosecutor with contempt of this impeachment court! I have evidence right here taken by Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, and to say that nasaktan ang tenga ko (my ears hurt) should have been (a cause) for you to walk out of this impeachment court. But you cannot make those contemptuous gestures in front of a judge, and get away with it,” Santiago declared.

Cayetano himself took the picture using his cellular phone camera.

Santiago made the motion to cite Aguirre in contempt soon after the volunteer lawyer candidly admitted to the impeachment court that he did cover his ears.

“That’s true because my ears already hurt,” Aguirre said, while being questioned by Senate President Pro Tempore Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada.

Estrada had inquired into Aguirre’s motive for publicly displaying his disdain for Santiago.

“It seemed that you don’t want to listen to her,” Estrada said. “That’s disrespect for a member of this court.”

Aguirre argued that he had to cover his ears because he did not agree with Santiago’s position that it was not usual for lawyers to withdraw, or amend their complaints.

“This happens every day. The fact is that this is the first time that I experienced in my 40 years of practice that a judge would lecture his lawyers. That’s not proper,” Aguirre said.

All about respect

Told by Estrada that he should have objected to Santiago’s manifestation, Aguirre retorted that he had “no right to object.”

Under the Senate rules, private prosecutors are under the supervision of the prosecution panel and can not debate with the senators.

Aguirre said: “May I say something? If my actuation has hurt somebody, I really did it purposely because my ears were hurting from her shrill voice. My point here is that even if we’re mere lawyers, we also deserve respect. If you demand respect, respect also these lawyers because human dignity has no equal.”

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=47882.0
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

Book your travel tickets anywhere in the world, go to www.12go.co

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

islander

  • SUPREME COURT
  • THE LEGEND
  • *****
  • Posts: 46867
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Travel Tickets
Re: Atty Vitaliano Aguirre Cited for Contempt at the Impeachment Trial
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2012, 12:20:19 PM »
wah happened? ;D

‘Gago’

Wednesday’s action-packed hearing was heralded by Santiago’s manifestation virulently attacking the prosecution for dropping five of the eight articles of impeachment against Corona.

She spewed out highly unpleasant remarks, but the House lead prosecutor, Iloilo Representative Niel Tupas Jr., meekly held his peace throughout the tense trial.

“I felt like creeping back into bed and adopting a fetal position, which is the normal reaction of any sane person when he’s faced with a world that is crumbling around him. I no longer know what universe I’m in … because I’ve never seen this done to a judge before,” Santiago said.

She blasted the prosecution, calling it names such as the offensive word, “gago.”

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/



Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=47882.0
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

Book your travel tickets anywhere in the world, go to www.12go.co

islander

  • SUPREME COURT
  • THE LEGEND
  • *****
  • Posts: 46867
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Travel Tickets
Re: Atty Vitaliano Aguirre Cited for Contempt at the Impeachment Trial
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2012, 12:30:20 PM »
How do you spell ‘wah?’

Upon a motion from the House deputy lead prosecutor, Ilocos Norte Representative Rodolfo Fariñas, this unparliamentary remark was later stricken from the record, with no objection from Santiago herself.

Scolding the prosecution, the senator said the prosecution was “playing games” with senator-judges in dropping the five articles after promising earlier to present about 100 witnesses.

“I was not born yesterday. We will be studied generations from now. This is a travesty. I request the secretariat to record in the journal that I said, ‘Wah!’” she said.

Santiago repeated this expression three times.

After the blast, Sotto said that Senator Serge Osmeña had asked, “What’s the spelling of ‘Wah?’”

No one asked Santiago what that term of endearment was all about.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=47882.0
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

Book your travel tickets anywhere in the world, go to www.12go.co

islander

  • SUPREME COURT
  • THE LEGEND
  • *****
  • Posts: 46867
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Travel Tickets
Re: Atty Vitaliano Aguirre Cited for Contempt at the Impeachment Trial
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2012, 12:37:04 PM »
makalingaw, hahaha! ;D

a friend had taken to heart a doctor's diagnosis that her baby may have some kind of "disorder" that makes her very intelligent but abnormally engrossed in her own world; i forgot the term but the doctor cited as an example for this disorder someone like senator miriam defensor santiago.  well, i told this friend, if it's someone like miriam santiago, i shouldn't worry.  nikatawa na lang intawon ang inahan nga naguol. 

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=47882.0
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

Book your travel tickets anywhere in the world, go to www.12go.co

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Tags: