MikeLigalig.com

How about, erasing "Island" in this "child board" tagged as "Panglao Island," which necessarily includes Dauis. Dauis has its own board already. Panglao as a municipality does not have the Island in it. Thanks.

Is it never-ending or never-NEVER STARTING?

Mao ni ako giingon nga hantod ron wa jud buhata sa Mayor.

pati term of use sa Youtube, violation lang gihapon. tsk.

Implementation of the law should not be arbitrary and whimsical. Kung ang usa ka balaud, magamando nga kinahanglang naay salvage zone, kinahanglang naay height restrictions sa mga building nga duol sa shoreline, kinahanglang naay density restrictions nga dili unta magduol-duol ang mga buildings salabi na sa duol sa dagat, TANAN unta nga nasud sa maong balaod ipatuman. (This is an actual ordinance.) Pero nganong kana ra man sa salvage zone ang gipatuman? kay ana ra maigo ang iyang mga kontra?.

Besides, okay kaau nga kanang mga dagko u dagko-dagko nga mga establishments nga naa pay kaatrasan, mao untay paatrason jud. Tagaan lang unta ug chance ang gagmay nga wala nay kaatrasan. As far as I know, title properties ra ba jud ni. Kinging mga restrictions nga atong gihisgutan diri, nagpasabot lang sa pag-limitar sa pag-gamit sa usa ka private property; DILI JUD ANG PAG DILI SA PAG-GAMIT niini kay this would tantamount to deprivation of the use of property without due process of law.

Again, manghinaut ko nga nasabtan ang akong mga gipangpulong diri. Salamat.

So what happened now, was there a second batch of the demolition spree? Was the Bolod area experienced demolition? Was the barangay road closed down by Dumaluan opened again by the Mayor for the local fisherfolks to pass? Of course the answers to thise line of questions are in the negative.

It is now very clear that it was really politically motivated. If not, why didn't the Mayor implement it when they were still in friendly terms. Let it should be pointed out the chronological order of the political events in Panglao and more importantly what caused the "falling off" between the Mayor and the Majority members of the Sangguniang Bayan. It was as early as Jan of 2008 when the Mayor called a meeting with the councilors only to force them to enact an ordinance accepting the Mactan Rock company as water distributor in the Alona Beach Area and provide for the corresponding water rates therein. When the councilors asked questions, the Mayor got angry, left his seat and went out to the door, only to go back again and shout at them, "Starting now, we will be enemies!"

Hence it is clear that it was the Mayor who drew the first blood, and continued drawing the councilor's blood by his seemingly "legal" act of demolishing properties of his enemies, when the latter stood their ground and defended the law and their principles.

If it would be the provincial government to implement the so called salvage zone, then it has to implement first Bohol Tropics, which almostt reached the wharf already, and many others in the city, where illegal reclamations already proliferated.

If the local ordinance of Panglao is to be implemented too, it should not limit to the salvaged zone only, as in the same ordinance, there are what are called "density restrictions" and "height restrcitions" which are being freely violated by almost every resort, except the big ones.

Now, talking about the big ones, isn't it a fact that even if they do not have any structure in the salvage zone area in their property, we ordinary tourists and even Panglaoanons cannot pass their prisine seashores? I think it's about time that we know the supposed to be purpose of the salvage zone law is in order to have access to the beach and to the sea and shore. As far as I know, the demolished sturctures of the Mayor's enemies did not hinder passage in their vicinity. So here, we can see that, as far as this implementation is concerned, what is being implement is the LETTER of the law, and not the SPIRIT of the law.

I hope I have expressed my ideas well enough for you guys. Thank you.

Why should we? and change all our records for that purpose?

I just want to point out that the sands in Panglao are not to be siphoned to make the artificial islands, per information advanced by the proponents, instead they will be dumping lots of aggregates in the seabed.