if this were true, at least they're doing it quietly, unlike the noise that politicians make.
at the risk of repeating myself for the nth time since last year, personally, i am against the rh bill, not because it constricts my rights (no one can ever impose their choice on me, ever) but because it reflects more of the same existing laws that are already in place (maternal care for women is already addressed by the magna carta of women).
what i cannot take is that my 10-year-old will be taught about human sexuality anytime soon. it's like robbing her of the innocence of childhood too early in the day. i don't believe our generation is any worse because we learned about the birds and the bees relatively much later.
also, there was pressure from first world countries expressed through denial of certain funds.
there was unmistakable lobbying from big pharmaceuticals who stand to gain the most.
some are presumed to have gotten rich over the bill's passage, courtesy of very thankful sectors. but that's between them and their god.
Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=71851.0
