Author Topic: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010  (Read 155195 times)

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1200 on: March 15, 2010, 06:13:39 PM »
kuyawa gud anang 7million..wa ba kaha cla matuk-an ana sa ilang gi kaun noh???
ikaw....wa ka magabai anang inyo gibuhat sa inyong kaatbang?.?.? poru istoryang dinungog gkan sa ubang taw, unya kong muhingan, mura ug tnoud kntahay ang pasangil. hahaha, pagbaton mu ug gamayng kaulaw. hahaha...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1201 on: March 15, 2010, 06:27:19 PM »
TUBAGA NA LEXMAR!!!!!  kay gigitik nako ug katawa dire
di na na kinahanglan tubagon ug tgsa tgsa jules...kay sa ginaingon ko nah...puro ra na gikan sa ubang taw nmu gkuha...kung kahibaw ka ug balaud gamay jules "a man is innocent until proven guilty"...dba? so, you have no right to name chatto CORRUPT or TRAYDOR kay di mu Ginoo para muhusga ug taw...aw kung isog mu, dad a nah sa korte ng imu mga istorya...UNYA ADTO NAH IBATO TANAN NI CHATTO INYONG MGA PASANGIL...HAHAHAHA, tan awon tah ug kinsay mapilde ug katarungan...di nang sige lang ka yawyaw aning tubag Bohol unya puro ra satsat, walay basehan bsag gamay...

aw nuon...mao ra man pod cguro nay gisugo sa inyo amu nga dauton ang taga pikas...so that shows how dirty he is in terms of Destroying Names Of People...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1202 on: March 15, 2010, 06:33:04 PM »
ay sus aron kintahay clean effect ang pag maniubra ni chatto sa iyang pagka politician? huh? paka arun ingnun kinthaay pod nga wa cya mo gamit ug casual sa pag pangumpanyA???hahahah labaw pana cya nagamit ug mga taw, gi gamit man gani niya ang mga taga hnu nga dili cya ang nag sueldo! hahahaha
hahaha....hala cge palabi jud jules sa imung pasangil....barugi nah imu istorya ha...kay imu na gilabot ang chronicles, unya karon HNU na pod? hahaha...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1203 on: March 15, 2010, 06:39:01 PM »
CORRECT ka jules! kani mga binayran ni chatto liwat pud niya way uwaw..brought up ug issue na binuhatan pud sa ila amo..tinudloan pud ug denial style :) kinsay giilad nila?
hahaha...that shows how you make stories on your own...kutob sa nikontra ninyo dinhi sa tubag bohol iassume ninyo nga tga chatto...hahahaha hala cge pasangil taman sa mahimu, after all binayran man pod mu sa inyo gilabanan so himuon jud ninyo tanan pra lang dauton ang pangalan ni chatto...di man pod mu mablame nko kung ingon ana mu kay "following orders" ra bya mu...hahaha,

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1204 on: March 15, 2010, 06:46:02 PM »
CORRECT ka jules! kani mga binayran ni chatto liwat pud niya way uwaw..brought up ug issue na binuhatan pud sa ila amo..tinudloan pud ug denial style :) kinsay giilad nila?
ai one thing miss bella...dili ko binayran ni chatto, ug kng kinsa man gni ngpabayad, kamo nah...nisulti lang ko sa ako na feel bahin sa inyong mga dirty tactics...kung gusto mu malinawan sa tanan ninyong istorya adto nah iistorya sa taw nga inyong gi akusahan...di nang mgpatuyang lang kah ug bira ug storya nga dili pah proven...ok?

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1205 on: March 15, 2010, 06:53:07 PM »
whatever.. i dont care also what u think..as ive said wako nagdaut ni chatto..akoa lang gi post dri unsa ako nahibaw an bahin nya, all the boholanos have the right to know. para nimo kay wka kauyon pandaut..daghan man sad nag post ug mga maut dri bahin ni herrera..unsa man na dili na daut kay uyon man ka? pag sure pu oi...
yah...boholanos have the right to have informations but not false ones. UNDERSTOOD? wala kay right mustorya sa mga butang nga dinungog nmu sa ubang taw...or gisugo ra ba kha sa imung amu nga ipapost dinhi...bearing false accusations sa ubang taw, sultian ta kah day usa ka dakong sala...wala pa gud ka kahbaw sa whole story nya hala2x dayon ka ug post...aw nuon, binayran man pod mu...hahahaha

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1206 on: March 15, 2010, 06:54:43 PM »
Lexmar,ako binayran? kanindot gud ug tinoud na? so,nanumangil sad ka? i will ask my friend who has the news cliipings with all the evidence about computers overpricing ug over spending sa imo amo sa iya office, basaha tarung ugma ha aron mauwaw ka sa imo gisulti na mohisgot ko ug issue wa koy basis or dili proven..kana ug naa pa kay uwaw nabilin :)
kana inyo respond tactics na ninyo kay dili nman mo mkatubag sa issue, perte ninyong laban ni chatto unya pangutan on mo bahin sa mga anomalya inyo amo moingon dayon mo na gama2x ang issue? tubaga ang mga pangutana nko..mao bitaw na "tubagbohol" ni :)

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1207 on: March 15, 2010, 06:55:54 PM »
paboang boang...hahahaha!!!!! group of liars!
kahibaw ka day...your GOOD @ ACCUSING...hahaha, gi akusahan na dayon ko nimu ug liar...hahaha, talent cguro nmu nah noh?....hahahaha,

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1208 on: March 15, 2010, 07:00:16 PM »
yah...boholanos have the right to have informations but not false ones. UNDERSTOOD? wala kay right mustorya sa mga butang nga dinungog nmu sa ubang taw...or gisugo ra ba kha sa imung amu nga ipapost dinhi...bearing false accusations sa ubang taw, sultian ta kah day usa ka dakong sala...wala pa gud ka kahbaw sa whole story nya hala2x dayon ka ug post...aw nuon, binayran man pod mu...hahahaha
hulata ako e post ugma ang evidence,ok? kna issue na casual kay herrera,nkahatag bka ug evidence ana? wala dba? ikaw una nihisgot binayran ko? ang miputak maoy nangitlog..hahahaha!!! ayaw pataka istorya kay tanan gibato issue ni herrera dri wala bisan isa ninyo nkahatag ug proof or evidence..before ka manaway sa muta sa lain taw kuhaa sa nang troso nka atang sa imong mata,ok? gets?

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1209 on: March 15, 2010, 07:02:39 PM »
kahibaw ka day...your GOOD @ ACCUSING...hahaha, gi akusahan na dayon ko nimu ug liar...hahaha, talent cguro nmu nah noh?....hahahaha,
talent sa imo amo..hahaha!!! i know u know that...
ajaw bya ka wa ha if ma prove nko diri unsa katinuod na issue ako gi brought up..daghan rba ninyo perteng laban ni chatto dri, unya kung naay anomalya ni chatto e post, dili na makatubag kay klaro kaayo na tinoud mangawala dayon...tsk3x...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1210 on: March 15, 2010, 07:06:04 PM »
Lexmar,ako binayran? kanindot gud ug tinoud na? so,nanumangil sad ka? i will ask my friend who has the news cliipings with all the evidence about computers overpricing ug over spending sa imo amo sa iya office, basaha tarung ugma ha aron mauwaw ka sa imo gisulti na mohisgot ko ug issue wa koy basis or dili proven..kana ug naa pa kay uwaw nabilin :)
kana inyo respond tactics na ninyo kay dili nman mo mkatubag sa issue, perte ninyong laban ni chatto unya pangutan on mo bahin sa mga anomalya inyo amo moingon dayon mo na gama2x ang issue? tubaga ang mga pangutana nko..mao bitaw na "tubagbohol" ni :)
owz? NEWSPAPERs ba ka mu? giingnan man gni ko sa imu kauban nga c jules nga dili kasaligan ang news paper kay lami daw paminawon kong dapig sa politiko...malay ko bah kung dapig pod ng herrera ng newspapera...gitubag pa jud ko ni jules nga SHEMPRE, pag ask nko nga "unsay pagtuo nmu tigsulat sa chronicles butbuton?"...pina "shempre" pa ang taw...Another false accusation ra bah jud....pati chronicles dauton aron lang mugawas nga siyay sakto....palamuot ra pod mo, nya karon newspaper pod inyo ibandera? hoi pra nko...dili ko mutoo sa mga pasangil ninyo hangtod c chatto na mismo ang mutubag ana kay inocente pa jud ang taw bsta wala pay igong ebidensya...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1211 on: March 15, 2010, 07:07:38 PM »
hulata ako e post ugma ang evidence,ok? kna issue na casual kay herrera,nkahatag bka ug evidence ana? wala dba? ikaw una nihisgot binayran ko? ang miputak maoy nangitlog..hahahaha!!! ayaw pataka istorya kay tanan gibato issue ni herrera dri wala bisan isa ninyo nkahatag ug proof or evidence..before ka manaway sa muta sa lain taw kuhaa sa nang troso nka atang sa imong mata,ok? gets?
hahaha...nangugat ai...hahaha, isulti kha nah sa imu kaugalingon, basin angayan pah....hehehe

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1212 on: March 15, 2010, 07:15:13 PM »
BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! wajud ko nangugat..tubaga sa ng issue or else you shut up nalang kay nonsense imo istorya,ok? wman ta nag chat2x lang dri kay bhala nonsense istorya...were here to post issue and talk about it and answer it...aw,ug walay e tubag kay klaro na tinoud..dpud ko mamugos...lout pud tawn, kahilakon na gani inyo amo sa iya press release ganiha na scripted hahahahah:)

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1213 on: March 15, 2010, 07:16:14 PM »
talent sa imo amo..hahaha!!! i know u know that...
ajaw bya ka wa ha if ma prove nko diri unsa katinuod na issue ako gi brought up..daghan rba ninyo perteng laban ni chatto dri, unya kung naay anomalya ni chatto e post, dili na makatubag kay klaro kaayo na tinoud mangawala dayon...tsk3x...
kinsay nangawala?...
hulata ako e post ugma ang evidence,ok? kna issue na casual kay herrera,nkahatag bka ug evidence ana? wala dba? ikaw una nihisgot binayran ko? ang miputak maoy nangitlog..hahahaha!!! ayaw pataka istorya kay tanan gibato issue ni herrera dri wala bisan isa ninyo nkahatag ug proof or evidence..before ka manaway sa muta sa lain taw kuhaa sa nang troso nka atang sa imong mata,ok? gets?
hala...nanghinaw pod dayon, hahahaha...one of your comrades said nga ok ra nga migamit c herrera sa iyang casual kay cya maoy ngpasulod ug trabaho...nya kinsa man diay ngpasweldo anang mga casual? di bah gobyerno? kwarta sa katawhan...sa pag ingon nya nga ok ra MIGAMIT si HERRERA sa iya casual, meaning miangkon sya...dba? So sultian takah day dili nah false accusation akua kay mismu imung kauban miangkon....

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1214 on: March 15, 2010, 07:20:54 PM »
BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! wajud ko nangugat..tubaga sa ng issue or else you shut up nalang kay nonsense imo istorya,ok? wman ta nag chat2x lang dri kay bhala nonsense istorya...were here to post issue and talk about it and answer it...aw,ug walay e tubag kay klaro na tinoud..dpud ko mamugos...lout pud tawn, kahilakon na gani inyo amo sa iya press release ganiha na scripted hahahahah:)
i'm not oblige to answer your questions kay dili ko swito sa mga kalihukan sa inyong kaatbang pero my purpose in opposing you...is...you are naming other people when in fact dinungog ra ninyo sa ubang taw...hahaha, abeh kay eleksyon dinautay dayon ug kaatbang, pra lang mamalhin ug botar ng mga taw....hahaha, luoya pod kah.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1215 on: March 15, 2010, 07:38:00 PM »
everything i posted here was and is in the news paper and being aired in the radio...
common lexmar, kinsa man lagi politiko wa sukad migamit ug casual? bisan si chatto everybody knows gamit pud siya casual, bisan gani tga hnu na dili iya opisina nagsueldo gamit gani nya...so,dili nana issue...gi issue lang na ninyo kay wa namoy lain ma issue ni herrera...kna pag gamit ni chatto sa hnu,wa nana gitakad ni herrera kay naay daghan dagko ug bug at na issue si chatto..kamo ug wala moy lain ma issue ni herrera hala pistahi ninyo na issue sa casual...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1216 on: March 15, 2010, 07:39:57 PM »
talent sa imo amo..hahaha!!! i know u know that...
ajaw bya ka wa ha if ma prove nko diri unsa katinuod na issue ako gi brought up..daghan rba ninyo perteng laban ni chatto dri, unya kung naay anomalya ni chatto e post, dili na makatubag kay klaro kaayo na tinoud mangawala dayon...tsk3x...
amo?...sa ginaingon ko na...dili nako amu si chatto, ang ako lng is let chatto answer your accusations, di kay mudiretso mu ug hingan nya ug dautan kay wala pa mu ka siguro kung tnuod ba nah inyung ginama gama nga istorya....aw nuon, dha man mu maayo...hehehehehe

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1217 on: March 15, 2010, 07:41:27 PM »
i will say this again and again DILI NI PANDAUT, as ive said im just sharing what ive heard and what ive read about chatto..unsaon pagdaut ug daut na daan? bisan gani sa dyrd na laban man unta na ni chatto na station wana gani nila na control...c chatto man jud isa sa tubag sa mga tao na maoy pinaka corrupt sa bohol...unsaon man na?

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1218 on: March 15, 2010, 07:45:00 PM »
everything i posted here was and is in the news paper and being aired in the radio...
common lexmar, kinsa man lagi politiko wa sukad migamit ug casual? bisan si chatto everybody knows gamit pud siya casual, bisan gani tga hnu na dili iya opisina nagsueldo gamit gani nya...so,dili nana issue...gi issue lang na ninyo kay wa namoy lain ma issue ni herrera...kna pag gamit ni chatto sa hnu,wa nana gitakad ni herrera kay naay daghan dagko ug bug at na issue si chatto..kamo ug wala moy lain ma issue ni herrera hala pistahi ninyo na issue sa casual...
oh tua...niangkon nah...hahahaha, naa lge nah sa news ng mga isyo bhin ni chatto pero ang pangutana kung proven ba?...unya kanang isyu mahitungod sa inyo amu, inyo na gud nah giangkon...so proven na nah siya...or wa lang ka kahibaw sa imung gipang istorya dha..?hahaha, by the way next tym na tah mg forum kay manihapon sa ko...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1219 on: March 15, 2010, 07:45:37 PM »
amo?...sa ginaingon ko na...dili nako amu si chatto, ang ako lng is let chatto answer your accusations, di kay mudiretso mu ug hingan nya ug dautan kay wala pa mu ka siguro kung tnuod ba nah inyung ginama gama nga istorya....aw nuon, dha man mu maayo...heehehehe
maao nay dakong problema lexmar,kung tigpaminaw ka sa radio,dili ug dili jud motubag na imo amo sa mga issue..kung motubag man gani kalibotlibot iya istorya,in the end wa gihapon niya matubag ang issue..bisan gani sa iya press release ganiha, simple kaayo pangutana dili mao tubag...kna cocofed dugay nana kaayo hangtud karon wa pa siyay klarong tubag..ang pork barrel niya hangtud pud karon wapud tubaga..ang pagpanghatag niya ug celfon sa 2nd district gitubag ba? wala...mao na,maayo man kha siya manulti dman mutobag ug issue.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1220 on: March 15, 2010, 07:47:39 PM »
give me specific issue about chatto na wala ma proven..answer directly..i will wait..
about sa over expense niya sa iya office i will post the news stating the offices and person source sa maong issue.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1221 on: March 15, 2010, 07:50:12 PM »
Lexmar,maayong pagpanihapon..hehehe..basin dili nko mkatubag kay magtoon pako..tiwas lang ta ugma ha...:)

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

mr_stoner

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1222 on: March 16, 2010, 11:20:11 AM »
i'm not oblige to answer your questions kay dili ko swito sa mga kalihukan sa inyong kaatbang pero my purpose in opposing you...is...you are naming other people when in fact dinungog ra ninyo sa ubang taw...hahaha, abeh kay eleksyon dinautay dayon ug kaatbang, pra lang mamalhin ug botar ng mga taw....hahaha, luoya pod kah.

parehas raman duha ka kampo puro dinongug. naa rana sa viewer or reader ug unsa ilang tuohan

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0
It isn`t enough to talk about peace. One must believe in it. And it isn`t enough to believe in it. One must work at it

mr_stoner

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1223 on: March 16, 2010, 11:25:38 AM »
di na na kinahanglan tubagon ug tgsa tgsa jules...kay sa ginaingon ko nah...puro ra na gikan sa ubang taw nmu gkuha...kung kahibaw ka ug balaud gamay jules "a man is innocent until proven guilty"...dba? so, you have no right to name chatto CORRUPT or TRAYDOR kay di mu Ginoo para muhusga ug taw...aw kung isog mu, dad a nah sa korte ng imu mga istorya...UNYA ADTO NAH IBATO TANAN NI CHATTO INYONG MGA PASANGIL...HAHAHAHA, tan awon tah ug kinsay mapilde ug katarungan...di nang sige lang ka yawyaw aning tubag Bohol unya puro ra satsat, walay basehan bsag gamay...

aw nuon...mao ra man pod cguro nay gisugo sa inyo amu nga dauton ang taga pikas...so that shows how dirty he is in terms of Destroying Names Of People...

naa diay mga sinugo ug pag pang daut dinhi? I thought natural lang nga mag hisgut ta dinhi sa duha ka candidate for governor.


Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0
It isn`t enough to talk about peace. One must believe in it. And it isn`t enough to believe in it. One must work at it

mr_stoner

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1224 on: March 16, 2010, 11:30:47 AM »
give me specific issue about chatto na wala ma proven..answer directly..i will wait..
about sa over expense niya sa iya office i will post the news stating the offices and person source sa maong issue.

kindly answer lexmar to make things clear

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0
It isn`t enough to talk about peace. One must believe in it. And it isn`t enough to believe in it. One must work at it

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1225 on: March 16, 2010, 12:55:14 PM »
give me specific issue about chatto na wala ma proven..answer directly..i will wait..
about sa over expense niya sa iya office i will post the news stating the offices and person source sa maong issue.
Miss Bella...example lang sa inyong mga issues is kadtong about sa treachery "daw" ni chatto ngadtong Gov....How credible are you to claim nga gitraydor jud ni chatto si Gov...? nkahibaw ba mu kung nahitabo bah jud ang pagtraydor?...Kay sa inyong paghingan ni chatto ug Traydor, mura na man mu ug nakahibaw sa tanan...nakighinabi ba mu, mismo ni chatto or di bah ni gov?...i have given you the example, now answeri tanang question nako...why are you naming chatto traitor like you know everything?...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1226 on: March 16, 2010, 01:04:39 PM »
maao nay dakong problema lexmar,kung tigpaminaw ka sa radio,dili ug dili jud motubag na imo amo sa mga issue..kung motubag man gani kalibotlibot iya istorya,in the end wa gihapon niya matubag ang issue..bisan gani sa iya press release ganiha, simple kaayo pangutana dili mao tubag...kna cocofed dugay nana kaayo hangtud karon wa pa siyay klarong tubag..ang pork barrel niya hangtud pud karon wapud tubaga..ang pagpanghatag niya ug celfon sa 2nd district gitubag ba? wala...mao na,maayo man kha siya manulti dman mutobag ug issue.
its natural nga mg hisgut tah ug mga issues diri sa tubag bohol kay forum man jud nih cya...pero ang dili natural kining ilang paghingan sa ilang kaatbang nga "Traydor" ug "Corrupt" kay gi claim na nila nga sakto sila, di bah diay lain ng muhingan ka ug taw ug ingon ka sayon, when in fact ang imu gigamit nga ebidensya is istorya ra pod sa laing taw?...dba?

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

jayson

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1227 on: March 16, 2010, 01:27:37 PM »
bellA let me refresh your mind.. so you are saying that all the statement you've posted is not true and all are in your own..kay nganung moingon man ka nga dinungog rapud nimo ang imung gipangpost, so nagpasabot there is no exact evidence nga mo accuse ka ni chatto..kay ug dinungog ra ni nimo posible nga taw rapud n herrerra ang nag uhan sa tanan..hope the simple post will bring you to reality and not to moneylity.........

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1228 on: March 16, 2010, 01:35:48 PM »
Chatto spent more than Nograles, Herrera says   

Rep. Edgar Chatto spent more than Speaker Prospero Nograles as far as the expenditures for Central Office Staff is concerned. This was the revelation made by Vice Gov. Julius Caesar Herrera following the release of the “Itemized List of Amounts Paid to and Expenses Incurred for Each Member of the House of Representatives”. “Would you believe that he has more functions than the Speaker?” the vice-governor asked.

According to the list released by the Commission on Audit (COA) through supervising auditor Rustico Jimenez, Chatto wracked up a total of P2,527,217.60 for central office staff.

The vice governor said this made Chatto among the House leaders in this category behind only Representatives Arrel Olaño, Antonio Cuenco, Arthur Defensor, Elias Bulut Jr., Jaime Lopez, Nicanor Briones, Manuel Zamora, Erico Basilio Fabian and Cynthia Villar. 

“How was the money spent?” Herrera asked.The vice-governor said he is wondering why Chatto would incur such a huge amount for “Central Office Staff” considering that his committees do not require huge manpower.

“Is it possible that the staff that is supposed to be working for Congress is instead being fielded for his gubernatorial candidacy?” Herrera asked.The vice governor, who once served as chief of staff of Sen. Ernesto Herrera, pointed out that he can find no logical explanation for the huge expenses.

He noted that if Chatto can outspend Nograles, he is no longer surprised that the first district congressman outspent his fellow Boholano solons.Rep. Adam Relson Jala reported expenditures totaling P2,090,506 while Rep. Roberto Cajes spent least with “only” P1,893,740.54.

For the period from January to December 2009, Chatto received P420,000 in basic salary; P1,010,000.04 for district allocation; P300,000 for contractual consultants; P540,000 for research; P810,456 for consultative local travel; P189,600 for communication; P180,000 for supplies; P500,400 for public affairs fund; P600,000 for MOE; P40,902 for an individual total of P7,118,575.87.

On top of the P7.1-million expenses, Herrera said Chatto receives an annual pork barrel allocation of P70-M.He said he is also wondering why Chatto refuses to make a public accounting of where the P70-M pork barrel funds last year went.

“I would not be surprised if part if not most of his pork barrel went to other districts,” the vice-governor added.             
Herrera noted that Chatto also refuses to release the list of the P630-M total pork barrel spending in nine years.

The vice-governor said he is considering the idea of filing a test case to compel Chatto or any congressman for that matter to make a public accounting of the funds.             
“If the funds were spent properly, there is no need to be afraid,” Herrera said.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1229 on: March 16, 2010, 01:48:14 PM »
bellA let me refresh your mind.. so you are saying that all the statement you've posted is not true and all are in your own..kay nganung moingon man ka nga dinungog rapud nimo ang imung gipangpost, so nagpasabot there is no exact evidence nga mo accuse ka ni chatto..kay ug dinungog ra ni nimo posible nga taw rapud n herrerra ang nag uhan sa tanan..hope the simple post will bring you to reality and not to moneylity.........
nabanhaw lagi ka doy..kung naay aso natural naay kayo.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

arki

  • EXPERT
  • ***
  • Posts: 1312
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1230 on: March 16, 2010, 01:50:30 PM »
Chatto spent more than Nograles, Herrera says   

Rep. Edgar Chatto spent more than Speaker Prospero Nograles as far as the expenditures for Central Office Staff is concerned. This was the revelation made by Vice Gov. Julius Caesar Herrera following the release of the “Itemized List of Amounts Paid to and Expenses Incurred for Each Member of the House of Representatives”. “Would you believe that he has more functions than the Speaker?” the vice-governor asked.

According to the list released by the Commission on Audit (COA) through supervising auditor Rustico Jimenez, Chatto wracked up a total of P2,527,217.60 for central office staff.

The vice governor said this made Chatto among the House leaders in this category behind only Representatives Arrel Olaño, Antonio Cuenco, Arthur Defensor, Elias Bulut Jr., Jaime Lopez, Nicanor Briones, Manuel Zamora, Erico Basilio Fabian and Cynthia Villar. 

“How was the money spent?” Herrera asked.The vice-governor said he is wondering why Chatto would incur such a huge amount for “Central Office Staff” considering that his committees do not require huge manpower.

“Is it possible that the staff that is supposed to be working for Congress is instead being fielded for his gubernatorial candidacy?” Herrera asked.The vice governor, who once served as chief of staff of Sen. Ernesto Herrera, pointed out that he can find no logical explanation for the huge expenses.

He noted that if Chatto can outspend Nograles, he is no longer surprised that the first district congressman outspent his fellow Boholano solons.Rep. Adam Relson Jala reported expenditures totaling P2,090,506 while Rep. Roberto Cajes spent least with “only” P1,893,740.54.

For the period from January to December 2009, Chatto received P420,000 in basic salary; P1,010,000.04 for district allocation; P300,000 for contractual consultants; P540,000 for research; P810,456 for consultative local travel; P189,600 for communication; P180,000 for supplies; P500,400 for public affairs fund; P600,000 for MOE; P40,902 for an individual total of P7,118,575.87.

On top of the P7.1-million expenses, Herrera said Chatto receives an annual pork barrel allocation of P70-M.He said he is also wondering why Chatto refuses to make a public accounting of where the P70-M pork barrel funds last year went.

“I would not be surprised if part if not most of his pork barrel went to other districts,” the vice-governor added.             
Herrera noted that Chatto also refuses to release the list of the P630-M total pork barrel spending in nine years.

The vice-governor said he is considering the idea of filing a test case to compel Chatto or any congressman for that matter to make a public accounting of the funds.             
“If the funds were spent properly, there is no need to be afraid,” Herrera said.

korekot jud...mao bitaw guidako ug budget kay anha kuwaon ang pangumpanya...kwarta sa katawhan...Mauwaw pud ko niana...Dapat mga congressman walay pork barrel...deretso sa probensya ang kwarta sa katawhan...congressman manghimo ra unta ug balaod..period...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

jayson

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1231 on: March 16, 2010, 02:09:21 PM »
BE HONEST

   The past weeks have seen the Grand Design of Deception against the Boholano people, packaged in a malicious distortion of facts with the end in sight of destroying the image of CONG. EDGAR M. CHATTO, a distinguished public servant who has reaped exemplary service honors and leadership excellence awards in varied roles he has found himself.  Lies have been peddled without fear also to put the Lakas-Kampi-CMD in bad light at the expense of the faithful and steadfast party leaders and members.

   The issues alleged are summarized as follows:

1. That Catigbian Mayor Roberto Salinas was unceremoniously rejected in his congressional bid in the First District.
   
In the words of then Political Affairs Sec. Gabriel Claudio and Gov. Erico Aumentado, the First District is a "zone of peace" for Chatto and Herrera camps to settle.  While discussions were supposed to take place, Salinas was suddenly pushed for congressman.  He admitted that he was told to run for congressman by Aumentado.  This was done without the benefit of consultation with and courtesy to Chatto, who was then the very District Chairman of Lakas-Kampi-CMD.  Salinas confided to the congressman that a Villar camp representative approached him for the same purpose, followed by Danao Mayor Thomas Gonzaga and, finally, by the governor.  Chatto politely cautioned Salinas of discussions being pushed involving the First District.  He candidly told him that it was for the same reason that he has in fact, not yet committed any support to anyone for the congressional seat.  The same caution was verbalized during the meeting of all Catigbian Municipal and Barangay Officials led by Salinas and Vice-Mayor Necitas Digaum. 

Subsequent events showed Salinas making rounds in the First District towns, even with groups not belonging to the party, installing tarpaulins all over the district.  He failed to get the nomination in the end.  So why blame Chatto?

Even his own barangay officials understood the circumstances surrounding his failure to secure the nomination.  In their own words, their mayor did not also consult them about his plan to run for Congress. All they expected was that he was preparing for reelection. He only discussed the matter with his fellow Catigbian municipal officials, who were surprised to hear him say "We are going to play a game this time---to start as Lakas and end up as NP." The same officials could not believe their Lakas mayor could say it, much less betray his own party, until Salinas and some other mayors just recently signed a manifesto against the Lakas leaders. Their belief was confirmed when Salinas gathered them a week after the manifesto and demanded from each of them to commit to move with him to NP.   

The decision to forge a coalition with the LDP was a collective act as evidenced by a signed document, dated November 24, 2009, addressed to National Party Chairman Gibo Teodoro, now our official presidential candidate. A similar letter of same date was addressed to Aumentado as Regional and Provincial Party Chairman then. Both documents were signed by Chatto, Secretary Art Yap, Cong. Roberto Cajes, Cong. Adam Relson Jala and former Cong. Eladio Jala.

During the CONA distribution at La Roca Hotel in Tagbilaran City on November 28, 2009, Aumentado categorically and emphatically supported the Lakas-Kampi-CMD-LDP Coalition. He declared, "Nalipay ko nga bisan dunay mibiya kanato nga atong mga kauban sa partido, duna say lig-on nga misulod sa atong partido ubos sa koalisyon Lakas-Kampi-CMD ug LDP nga gipangulohan ni Sen. Angara ug ang ato nga coalition partner nga mao usab kini ang atong (kandidato sa)  congressman.  Ang atong gubernatorial candidate maoy mopahibalo niini.  Sa way lipod-lipod ako mosuporta ni kanhi Gob. Rene Relampagos pagka representante sa Primero Distrito kay usa kini ka conciliating factor; nga duna kitay nawala apan daghan ug dako usab nga pundok ang mibali ug mopuli sa mga mibiya kanato. (I am happy that even if we had partymates who left, there are strong ones joining us under the coalition of Lakas-Kampi-CMD and LDP, which is led by Sen. Angara and our coalition partner who will also be our (candidate for) congressman. Our gubernatorial candidate will make the announcement. Without reservation, I will support former Gov. Rene Relampagos for representative of the First District because this is a conciliatory factor; that we lost some but a greater and bigger group has joined us to fill their place.)” This Aumentado declaration received a thunderous applause from the party members, including the municipal slates.

Hence, it is very clear that there was concurrence by the local party to the coalition.  It is crystal clear that Salinas has no basis to stand on in blaming Chatto and the party for his failure to get the nomination.


2. The Shameless manipulation that led to the revocation of the CONA issued to Gov. Aumentado for the 2nd Congressional District, was an evident treachery because the conspirators waited until the last minute for the filing of candidacy on Dec. 1, 2009 before they revealed the revocation.

In a live interview over “Inyong Alagad” on Station DYRD on Dec. 2, 2009, Lakas National Secretary-General Francis Manglapus exhaustively discussed the causes and reasons behind the revocation, to include acts inimical to party interest.  He also categorically stated that Cong. Chatto was not behind and had no knowledge of the revocation.  "It was not in consultation with him (Chatto) but with all the different levels of the political intelligence and that it was not an instant decision although it may be perceived as a last minute revocation," Manglapus said.   

   The revocation of the CONA of Aumentado was a consequence of his own doing. What has motivated his GRAND SCHEME of fielding two (2) slates in Bohol to serve the interests of two parties – Lakas and NP - is very obvious to the well-meaning Boholanos.  It is too glaring to hide and is easily noticed by just looking at the circumstances of events and the persons involved in both sides of the equation. 

   We share the views of the hate manifesto signatories when "they watched the 2 events with sadness and frustration." But we say here that these could have been avoided if there were consultations prior to Aumentado’s late and “last-minute” turn-over of the provincial party chairmanship to Chatto on Nov. 28, 2009, already three days before the deadline of the filing of Certificate of Candidacy (COC).  They could not blame the present party leaders while we agree that the normal process of consultation should have been observed.
   

3.   The fielding of candidates against loyal party members such as in the towns of Talibon, Getafe and Dagohoy.

Congressman Cajes may have his own reasons for putting up the said slates in some 2nd District towns considering that he is the incumbent congressman there. Chatto endeavored to maintain impartiality to the last minute even as the mayors of Dagohoy and Talibon openly expressed preference for Villar and Herrera earlier.

Aumentado and Cajes had then agreed to elevate the issue involving Dagohoy, Talibon and Getafe to the national headquarters due to the peculiarity of their political scenario.  Meanwhile, Chatto’s focus was then confined to the First District where he was the district party chairman at that time.  It cannot, therefore, stand to attribute to Chatto the seeming conflict among the Lakas members in the said 2nd District towns.  Again, this is an offshoot of the calculated delay in the turnover of the provincial party chairmanship. 


4. The claim of Getafe, Dagohoy and Buenavista of a 12-0 win for Lakas senatorial slate in the 2007 elections is part of the victory that is shared with other municipalities. These towns were lucky in being not among the municipalities where sample ballots released from the Governor's Mansion suddenly had insertions of NP candidate and other names not belonging to the party.  The “polka dots” sample ballots were spread out even if a 12-0 result was “strongly emphasized” by the governor himself. Having delivered a 12-0 sweep in the past poll cannot guarantee the same loyalty now that Gibo Teodoro is the standard bearer and not the sitting President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. The pattern of deception has begun repeating itself. The cycle is coming to full vicious circle. Luckily for the people, the same perpetrators have again exposed themselves---and earlier this election time.  They mentioned Balilihan and Trinidad as having not delivered a 12-0 sweep, but not Aumentado’s hometown of Ubay which result was only 9-3.  Balilihan and Trinidad gave an identical 11-1 result.  So which leaders failed to deliver?


5. Prior to November 28 last year, no party meetings or consultations were done. The chairmanship was turned over to Chatto only on the said date, which was already closer to the last filing of the COC. In fact, Chatto was to succeed the Bohol chairmanship of the party when all the slots in the 2nd and 3rd District were already filled up by Aumentado without due consultation and courtesy. It was like turning over to a new captain a ship about to sail with crewmembers who can turn out to be pirates.

Party disunity is a natural consequence of Aumentado’s grand design to create two slates in the province. Chatto inherited the seeming discord within the Lakas-Kampi-CMD. This is a scenario that was conspicuously preluded and manifested by the shift of Herrera to the Nacionalista Party while the followers were instructed to remain in Lakas to serve his interest and of the NP.

No wonder, Atty. Tomas Abapo, former provincial administrator and alter ego of Aumentado, has been consistently harping that there are several mayors who are with Lakas but only in paper.  These Lakas in faces are actually NP by hearts and deeds.  Their manifestos have only sadly confirmed this fact!

Although the COMELEC has ruled Aumentado as the official Lakas congressional bet in the 2nd District, the same ruling has still been appealed. Prudence and law dictate that in the absence of a final ruling to that effect, both Aumentado and Mayor Judith Cajes are still in the running as far as who is the ultimate official candidate is concerned.

The signatories assailed the national and provincial party leaderships for indifference to their cries. Yet, they affirmed that Chatto and other new Lakas officials have been constantly calling meetings in municipal and barangay levels. This is precisely the kind of participative governance and leadership Chatto has been known for, and in which the leaders down the grassroot level are consulted on party concerns. Despite being notified of meetings, the party dissenters refused to honor the invitation.  Worst, they labeled by alibi their interest-serving absence as the root of their own confusion.

For one, the visit of presidential aspirant Gibo Teodoro has offered us a glimpse of their mask and sinister attitude. For how could they ever explain their meeting with Villar in Cebu City on February 21, 2010 while Teodoro and the rest of the loyal Lakas partymates gathered in Balilihan on the birthday celebration of Chatto?  Due notices were sent. Who, then, are the hypocrites, treacherous, liars and excusers by alibis?

It is disheartening that these self-claimed victims of hypocrisy and treachery maliciously and advertently gain mandate in all their political dealings.

This leads us to the inevitable question: How could they have done all these if indeed they have been loyal to the party all these years?


6.   That Chatto's leadership is inutile and ineffective. 

          Leadership is one issue we love the people to decide.  It is, modesty
aside, one argument that we can hardly lose.  But the issue here is not about leadership. It is rather about a GRAND DESIGN of DECEPTION and DISLOYALTY---or LOYALTY TO INTEREST---by creating 2 slates to serve Lakas less and satisfy NP more.  Or is it feeding NP with Lakas food?


7.   That the signatories are treated second-class citizens in the Lakas Party.
   
This is another patent alibi in laying the predicate of their argument for bolting Lakas and, happily, campaign for NP in the open.  Everybody in the party is treated equally.


8.   That Aumentado lost in 2004 elections in Balilihan.

Aumentado lost in Balilihan not just in 2004 election but also in 2001.  But here is the fairest equation. COMELEC records show that in the 2001 election, Aumentado lost in Balilihan by 2,253 votes when then Vice Gov. Chatto and Gov. Relampagos were in tandem.  Relampagos lost in the Bohol-wide count. In their 2004 rematch, Aumentado, already the governor, lost to Relampagos by only 52 votes in the same town. Hence, he won 2201 more votes in Balilihan over the same opponent in their second and final fight.  Aumentado got the additional huge vote when he and Chatto joined on account of the then unification.  And figures won’t lie.   


9.   That Chatto will benefit from the support of LDP Candidates in some towns.

      Records should be put straight that Chatto never called Relampagos to
issue LDP CONAs to opponents of Lakas candidates.  Instead, it was Aumentado who called Relampagos to issue LDP CONAs to the mayoralty candidates in Ubay and Getafe.  In fact, Chatto was surprised why no Lakas CONA was requested by Aumentado from national Lakas for the Getafe candidate when Aumentado himself facilitated the release of the CONA photocopies from the National Lakas Office for Dagohoy and Talibon.  This was evidenced by his text message addressed to the National Office for the CONAs of Dagohoy and Talibon only.


        These are NOT excuses and alibis.  These are RELIABLE FACTS---the PLAIN TRUTH. 
 
 We believe that when conscience is threatened by extreme short supply, we must frustrate all attempts to poison the people’s mind.  With strong mutual faith and trust---and being a people endowed with intellect that cannot fail for good ends---we cannot miscalculate our fate.

 We are convinced more than ever that between hypocrisy and deception, it always comforts to choose truth.  By this conviction we, therefore, declare and reiterate, with all the might of our conscience and capacities, to stay one and committed under the party leadership of our gubernatorial standard bearer Cong. Edgar M. Chatto.  HE IS THE BEST TO LEAD BOHOL  next no matter how worst the lies against us and the people.

   In this prelude to another mandate come election day, we can only ask
for God’s wisdom and guidance.


PADAYON BOL-ANON


Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

jayson

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1232 on: March 16, 2010, 02:11:09 PM »
BE HONEST

   The past weeks have seen the Grand Design of Deception against the Boholano people, packaged in a malicious distortion of facts with the end in sight of destroying the image of CONG. EDGAR M. CHATTO, a distinguished public servant who has reaped exemplary service honors and leadership excellence awards in varied roles he has found himself.  Lies have been peddled without fear also to put the Lakas-Kampi-CMD in bad light at the expense of the faithful and steadfast party leaders and members.

   The issues alleged are summarized as follows:

1. That Catigbian Mayor Roberto Salinas was unceremoniously rejected in his congressional bid in the First District.
   
In the words of then Political Affairs Sec. Gabriel Claudio and Gov. Erico Aumentado, the First District is a "zone of peace" for Chatto and Herrera camps to settle.  While discussions were supposed to take place, Salinas was suddenly pushed for congressman.  He admitted that he was told to run for congressman by Aumentado.  This was done without the benefit of consultation with and courtesy to Chatto, who was then the very District Chairman of Lakas-Kampi-CMD.  Salinas confided to the congressman that a Villar camp representative approached him for the same purpose, followed by Danao Mayor Thomas Gonzaga and, finally, by the governor.  Chatto politely cautioned Salinas of discussions being pushed involving the First District.  He candidly told him that it was for the same reason that he has in fact, not yet committed any support to anyone for the congressional seat.  The same caution was verbalized during the meeting of all Catigbian Municipal and Barangay Officials led by Salinas and Vice-Mayor Necitas Digaum. 

Subsequent events showed Salinas making rounds in the First District towns, even with groups not belonging to the party, installing tarpaulins all over the district.  He failed to get the nomination in the end.  So why blame Chatto?

Even his own barangay officials understood the circumstances surrounding his failure to secure the nomination.  In their own words, their mayor did not also consult them about his plan to run for Congress. All they expected was that he was preparing for reelection. He only discussed the matter with his fellow Catigbian municipal officials, who were surprised to hear him say "We are going to play a game this time---to start as Lakas and end up as NP." The same officials could not believe their Lakas mayor could say it, much less betray his own party, until Salinas and some other mayors just recently signed a manifesto against the Lakas leaders. Their belief was confirmed when Salinas gathered them a week after the manifesto and demanded from each of them to commit to move with him to NP.   

The decision to forge a coalition with the LDP was a collective act as evidenced by a signed document, dated November 24, 2009, addressed to National Party Chairman Gibo Teodoro, now our official presidential candidate. A similar letter of same date was addressed to Aumentado as Regional and Provincial Party Chairman then. Both documents were signed by Chatto, Secretary Art Yap, Cong. Roberto Cajes, Cong. Adam Relson Jala and former Cong. Eladio Jala.

During the CONA distribution at La Roca Hotel in Tagbilaran City on November 28, 2009, Aumentado categorically and emphatically supported the Lakas-Kampi-CMD-LDP Coalition. He declared, "Nalipay ko nga bisan dunay mibiya kanato nga atong mga kauban sa partido, duna say lig-on nga misulod sa atong partido ubos sa koalisyon Lakas-Kampi-CMD ug LDP nga gipangulohan ni Sen. Angara ug ang ato nga coalition partner nga mao usab kini ang atong (kandidato sa)  congressman.  Ang atong gubernatorial candidate maoy mopahibalo niini.  Sa way lipod-lipod ako mosuporta ni kanhi Gob. Rene Relampagos pagka representante sa Primero Distrito kay usa kini ka conciliating factor; nga duna kitay nawala apan daghan ug dako usab nga pundok ang mibali ug mopuli sa mga mibiya kanato. (I am happy that even if we had partymates who left, there are strong ones joining us under the coalition of Lakas-Kampi-CMD and LDP, which is led by Sen. Angara and our coalition partner who will also be our (candidate for) congressman. Our gubernatorial candidate will make the announcement. Without reservation, I will support former Gov. Rene Relampagos for representative of the First District because this is a conciliatory factor; that we lost some but a greater and bigger group has joined us to fill their place.)” This Aumentado declaration received a thunderous applause from the party members, including the municipal slates.

Hence, it is very clear that there was concurrence by the local party to the coalition.  It is crystal clear that Salinas has no basis to stand on in blaming Chatto and the party for his failure to get the nomination.


2. The Shameless manipulation that led to the revocation of the CONA issued to Gov. Aumentado for the 2nd Congressional District, was an evident treachery because the conspirators waited until the last minute for the filing of candidacy on Dec. 1, 2009 before they revealed the revocation.

In a live interview over “Inyong Alagad” on Station DYRD on Dec. 2, 2009, Lakas National Secretary-General Francis Manglapus exhaustively discussed the causes and reasons behind the revocation, to include acts inimical to party interest.  He also categorically stated that Cong. Chatto was not behind and had no knowledge of the revocation.  "It was not in consultation with him (Chatto) but with all the different levels of the political intelligence and that it was not an instant decision although it may be perceived as a last minute revocation," Manglapus said.   

   The revocation of the CONA of Aumentado was a consequence of his own doing. What has motivated his GRAND SCHEME of fielding two (2) slates in Bohol to serve the interests of two parties – Lakas and NP - is very obvious to the well-meaning Boholanos.  It is too glaring to hide and is easily noticed by just looking at the circumstances of events and the persons involved in both sides of the equation. 

   We share the views of the hate manifesto signatories when "they watched the 2 events with sadness and frustration." But we say here that these could have been avoided if there were consultations prior to Aumentado’s late and “last-minute” turn-over of the provincial party chairmanship to Chatto on Nov. 28, 2009, already three days before the deadline of the filing of Certificate of Candidacy (COC).  They could not blame the present party leaders while we agree that the normal process of consultation should have been observed.
   

3.   The fielding of candidates against loyal party members such as in the towns of Talibon, Getafe and Dagohoy.

Congressman Cajes may have his own reasons for putting up the said slates in some 2nd District towns considering that he is the incumbent congressman there. Chatto endeavored to maintain impartiality to the last minute even as the mayors of Dagohoy and Talibon openly expressed preference for Villar and Herrera earlier.

Aumentado and Cajes had then agreed to elevate the issue involving Dagohoy, Talibon and Getafe to the national headquarters due to the peculiarity of their political scenario.  Meanwhile, Chatto’s focus was then confined to the First District where he was the district party chairman at that time.  It cannot, therefore, stand to attribute to Chatto the seeming conflict among the Lakas members in the said 2nd District towns.  Again, this is an offshoot of the calculated delay in the turnover of the provincial party chairmanship. 


4. The claim of Getafe, Dagohoy and Buenavista of a 12-0 win for Lakas senatorial slate in the 2007 elections is part of the victory that is shared with other municipalities. These towns were lucky in being not among the municipalities where sample ballots released from the Governor's Mansion suddenly had insertions of NP candidate and other names not belonging to the party.  The “polka dots” sample ballots were spread out even if a 12-0 result was “strongly emphasized” by the governor himself. Having delivered a 12-0 sweep in the past poll cannot guarantee the same loyalty now that Gibo Teodoro is the standard bearer and not the sitting President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. The pattern of deception has begun repeating itself. The cycle is coming to full vicious circle. Luckily for the people, the same perpetrators have again exposed themselves---and earlier this election time.  They mentioned Balilihan and Trinidad as having not delivered a 12-0 sweep, but not Aumentado’s hometown of Ubay which result was only 9-3.  Balilihan and Trinidad gave an identical 11-1 result.  So which leaders failed to deliver?


5. Prior to November 28 last year, no party meetings or consultations were done. The chairmanship was turned over to Chatto only on the said date, which was already closer to the last filing of the COC. In fact, Chatto was to succeed the Bohol chairmanship of the party when all the slots in the 2nd and 3rd District were already filled up by Aumentado without due consultation and courtesy. It was like turning over to a new captain a ship about to sail with crewmembers who can turn out to be pirates.

Party disunity is a natural consequence of Aumentado’s grand design to create two slates in the province. Chatto inherited the seeming discord within the Lakas-Kampi-CMD. This is a scenario that was conspicuously preluded and manifested by the shift of Herrera to the Nacionalista Party while the followers were instructed to remain in Lakas to serve his interest and of the NP.

No wonder, Atty. Tomas Abapo, former provincial administrator and alter ego of Aumentado, has been consistently harping that there are several mayors who are with Lakas but only in paper.  These Lakas in faces are actually NP by hearts and deeds.  Their manifestos have only sadly confirmed this fact!

Although the COMELEC has ruled Aumentado as the official Lakas congressional bet in the 2nd District, the same ruling has still been appealed. Prudence and law dictate that in the absence of a final ruling to that effect, both Aumentado and Mayor Judith Cajes are still in the running as far as who is the ultimate official candidate is concerned.

The signatories assailed the national and provincial party leaderships for indifference to their cries. Yet, they affirmed that Chatto and other new Lakas officials have been constantly calling meetings in municipal and barangay levels. This is precisely the kind of participative governance and leadership Chatto has been known for, and in which the leaders down the grassroot level are consulted on party concerns. Despite being notified of meetings, the party dissenters refused to honor the invitation.  Worst, they labeled by alibi their interest-serving absence as the root of their own confusion.

For one, the visit of presidential aspirant Gibo Teodoro has offered us a glimpse of their mask and sinister attitude. For how could they ever explain their meeting with Villar in Cebu City on February 21, 2010 while Teodoro and the rest of the loyal Lakas partymates gathered in Balilihan on the birthday celebration of Chatto?  Due notices were sent. Who, then, are the hypocrites, treacherous, liars and excusers by alibis?

It is disheartening that these self-claimed victims of hypocrisy and treachery maliciously and advertently gain mandate in all their political dealings.

This leads us to the inevitable question: How could they have done all these if indeed they have been loyal to the party all these years?


6.   That Chatto's leadership is inutile and ineffective. 

          Leadership is one issue we love the people to decide.  It is, modesty
aside, one argument that we can hardly lose.  But the issue here is not about leadership. It is rather about a GRAND DESIGN of DECEPTION and DISLOYALTY---or LOYALTY TO INTEREST---by creating 2 slates to serve Lakas less and satisfy NP more.  Or is it feeding NP with Lakas food?


7.   That the signatories are treated second-class citizens in the Lakas Party.
   
This is another patent alibi in laying the predicate of their argument for bolting Lakas and, happily, campaign for NP in the open.  Everybody in the party is treated equally.


8.   That Aumentado lost in 2004 elections in Balilihan.

Aumentado lost in Balilihan not just in 2004 election but also in 2001.  But here is the fairest equation. COMELEC records show that in the 2001 election, Aumentado lost in Balilihan by 2,253 votes when then Vice Gov. Chatto and Gov. Relampagos were in tandem.  Relampagos lost in the Bohol-wide count. In their 2004 rematch, Aumentado, already the governor, lost to Relampagos by only 52 votes in the same town. Hence, he won 2201 more votes in Balilihan over the same opponent in their second and final fight.  Aumentado got the additional huge vote when he and Chatto joined on account of the then unification.  And figures won’t lie.   


9.   That Chatto will benefit from the support of LDP Candidates in some towns.

      Records should be put straight that Chatto never called Relampagos to
issue LDP CONAs to opponents of Lakas candidates.  Instead, it was Aumentado who called Relampagos to issue LDP CONAs to the mayoralty candidates in Ubay and Getafe.  In fact, Chatto was surprised why no Lakas CONA was requested by Aumentado from national Lakas for the Getafe candidate when Aumentado himself facilitated the release of the CONA photocopies from the National Lakas Office for Dagohoy and Talibon.  This was evidenced by his text message addressed to the National Office for the CONAs of Dagohoy and Talibon only.


        These are NOT excuses and alibis.  These are RELIABLE FACTS---the PLAIN TRUTH. 
 
 We believe that when conscience is threatened by extreme short supply, we must frustrate all attempts to poison the people’s mind.  With strong mutual faith and trust---and being a people endowed with intellect that cannot fail for good ends---we cannot miscalculate our fate.

 We are convinced more than ever that between hypocrisy and deception, it always comforts to choose truth.  By this conviction we, therefore, declare and reiterate, with all the might of our conscience and capacities, to stay one and committed under the party leadership of our gubernatorial standard bearer Cong. Edgar M. Chatto.  HE IS THE BEST TO LEAD BOHOL  next no matter how worst the lies against us and the people.

   In this prelude to another mandate come election day, we can only ask
for God’s wisdom and guidance.


PADAYON BOL-ANON


Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

arki

  • EXPERT
  • ***
  • Posts: 1312
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1233 on: March 16, 2010, 02:12:39 PM »
bakak na??? manipulate kaajo....bagsak

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

jayson

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1234 on: March 16, 2010, 02:13:57 PM »
BE HONEST

   The past weeks have seen the Grand Design of Deception against the Boholano people, packaged in a malicious distortion of facts with the end in sight of destroying the image of CONG. EDGAR M. CHATTO, a distinguished public servant who has reaped exemplary service honors and leadership excellence awards in varied roles he has found himself.  Lies have been peddled without fear also to put the Lakas-Kampi-CMD in bad light at the expense of the faithful and steadfast party leaders and members.

   The issues alleged are summarized as follows:

1. That Catigbian Mayor Roberto Salinas was unceremoniously rejected in his congressional bid in the First District.
   
In the words of then Political Affairs Sec. Gabriel Claudio and Gov. Erico Aumentado, the First District is a "zone of peace" for Chatto and Herrera camps to settle.  While discussions were supposed to take place, Salinas was suddenly pushed for congressman.  He admitted that he was told to run for congressman by Aumentado.  This was done without the benefit of consultation with and courtesy to Chatto, who was then the very District Chairman of Lakas-Kampi-CMD.  Salinas confided to the congressman that a Villar camp representative approached him for the same purpose, followed by Danao Mayor Thomas Gonzaga and, finally, by the governor.  Chatto politely cautioned Salinas of discussions being pushed involving the First District.  He candidly told him that it was for the same reason that he has in fact, not yet committed any support to anyone for the congressional seat.  The same caution was verbalized during the meeting of all Catigbian Municipal and Barangay Officials led by Salinas and Vice-Mayor Necitas Digaum. 

Subsequent events showed Salinas making rounds in the First District towns, even with groups not belonging to the party, installing tarpaulins all over the district.  He failed to get the nomination in the end.  So why blame Chatto?

Even his own barangay officials understood the circumstances surrounding his failure to secure the nomination.  In their own words, their mayor did not also consult them about his plan to run for Congress. All they expected was that he was preparing for reelection. He only discussed the matter with his fellow Catigbian municipal officials, who were surprised to hear him say "We are going to play a game this time---to start as Lakas and end up as NP." The same officials could not believe their Lakas mayor could say it, much less betray his own party, until Salinas and some other mayors just recently signed a manifesto against the Lakas leaders. Their belief was confirmed when Salinas gathered them a week after the manifesto and demanded from each of them to commit to move with him to NP.   

The decision to forge a coalition with the LDP was a collective act as evidenced by a signed document, dated November 24, 2009, addressed to National Party Chairman Gibo Teodoro, now our official presidential candidate. A similar letter of same date was addressed to Aumentado as Regional and Provincial Party Chairman then. Both documents were signed by Chatto, Secretary Art Yap, Cong. Roberto Cajes, Cong. Adam Relson Jala and former Cong. Eladio Jala.

During the CONA distribution at La Roca Hotel in Tagbilaran City on November 28, 2009, Aumentado categorically and emphatically supported the Lakas-Kampi-CMD-LDP Coalition. He declared, "Nalipay ko nga bisan dunay mibiya kanato nga atong mga kauban sa partido, duna say lig-on nga misulod sa atong partido ubos sa koalisyon Lakas-Kampi-CMD ug LDP nga gipangulohan ni Sen. Angara ug ang ato nga coalition partner nga mao usab kini ang atong (kandidato sa)  congressman.  Ang atong gubernatorial candidate maoy mopahibalo niini.  Sa way lipod-lipod ako mosuporta ni kanhi Gob. Rene Relampagos pagka representante sa Primero Distrito kay usa kini ka conciliating factor; nga duna kitay nawala apan daghan ug dako usab nga pundok ang mibali ug mopuli sa mga mibiya kanato. (I am happy that even if we had partymates who left, there are strong ones joining us under the coalition of Lakas-Kampi-CMD and LDP, which is led by Sen. Angara and our coalition partner who will also be our (candidate for) congressman. Our gubernatorial candidate will make the announcement. Without reservation, I will support former Gov. Rene Relampagos for representative of the First District because this is a conciliatory factor; that we lost some but a greater and bigger group has joined us to fill their place.)” This Aumentado declaration received a thunderous applause from the party members, including the municipal slates.

Hence, it is very clear that there was concurrence by the local party to the coalition.  It is crystal clear that Salinas has no basis to stand on in blaming Chatto and the party for his failure to get the nomination.


2. The Shameless manipulation that led to the revocation of the CONA issued to Gov. Aumentado for the 2nd Congressional District, was an evident treachery because the conspirators waited until the last minute for the filing of candidacy on Dec. 1, 2009 before they revealed the revocation.

In a live interview over “Inyong Alagad” on Station DYRD on Dec. 2, 2009, Lakas National Secretary-General Francis Manglapus exhaustively discussed the causes and reasons behind the revocation, to include acts inimical to party interest.  He also categorically stated that Cong. Chatto was not behind and had no knowledge of the revocation.  "It was not in consultation with him (Chatto) but with all the different levels of the political intelligence and that it was not an instant decision although it may be perceived as a last minute revocation," Manglapus said.   

   The revocation of the CONA of Aumentado was a consequence of his own doing. What has motivated his GRAND SCHEME of fielding two (2) slates in Bohol to serve the interests of two parties – Lakas and NP - is very obvious to the well-meaning Boholanos.  It is too glaring to hide and is easily noticed by just looking at the circumstances of events and the persons involved in both sides of the equation. 

   We share the views of the hate manifesto signatories when "they watched the 2 events with sadness and frustration." But we say here that these could have been avoided if there were consultations prior to Aumentado’s late and “last-minute” turn-over of the provincial party chairmanship to Chatto on Nov. 28, 2009, already three days before the deadline of the filing of Certificate of Candidacy (COC).  They could not blame the present party leaders while we agree that the normal process of consultation should have been observed.
   

3.   The fielding of candidates against loyal party members such as in the towns of Talibon, Getafe and Dagohoy.

Congressman Cajes may have his own reasons for putting up the said slates in some 2nd District towns considering that he is the incumbent congressman there. Chatto endeavored to maintain impartiality to the last minute even as the mayors of Dagohoy and Talibon openly expressed preference for Villar and Herrera earlier.

Aumentado and Cajes had then agreed to elevate the issue involving Dagohoy, Talibon and Getafe to the national headquarters due to the peculiarity of their political scenario.  Meanwhile, Chatto’s focus was then confined to the First District where he was the district party chairman at that time.  It cannot, therefore, stand to attribute to Chatto the seeming conflict among the Lakas members in the said 2nd District towns.  Again, this is an offshoot of the calculated delay in the turnover of the provincial party chairmanship. 


4. The claim of Getafe, Dagohoy and Buenavista of a 12-0 win for Lakas senatorial slate in the 2007 elections is part of the victory that is shared with other municipalities. These towns were lucky in being not among the municipalities where sample ballots released from the Governor's Mansion suddenly had insertions of NP candidate and other names not belonging to the party.  The “polka dots” sample ballots were spread out even if a 12-0 result was “strongly emphasized” by the governor himself. Having delivered a 12-0 sweep in the past poll cannot guarantee the same loyalty now that Gibo Teodoro is the standard bearer and not the sitting President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. The pattern of deception has begun repeating itself. The cycle is coming to full vicious circle. Luckily for the people, the same perpetrators have again exposed themselves---and earlier this election time.  They mentioned Balilihan and Trinidad as having not delivered a 12-0 sweep, but not Aumentado’s hometown of Ubay which result was only 9-3.  Balilihan and Trinidad gave an identical 11-1 result.  So which leaders failed to deliver?


5. Prior to November 28 last year, no party meetings or consultations were done. The chairmanship was turned over to Chatto only on the said date, which was already closer to the last filing of the COC. In fact, Chatto was to succeed the Bohol chairmanship of the party when all the slots in the 2nd and 3rd District were already filled up by Aumentado without due consultation and courtesy. It was like turning over to a new captain a ship about to sail with crewmembers who can turn out to be pirates.

Party disunity is a natural consequence of Aumentado’s grand design to create two slates in the province. Chatto inherited the seeming discord within the Lakas-Kampi-CMD. This is a scenario that was conspicuously preluded and manifested by the shift of Herrera to the Nacionalista Party while the followers were instructed to remain in Lakas to serve his interest and of the NP.

No wonder, Atty. Tomas Abapo, former provincial administrator and alter ego of Aumentado, has been consistently harping that there are several mayors who are with Lakas but only in paper.  These Lakas in faces are actually NP by hearts and deeds.  Their manifestos have only sadly confirmed this fact!

Although the COMELEC has ruled Aumentado as the official Lakas congressional bet in the 2nd District, the same ruling has still been appealed. Prudence and law dictate that in the absence of a final ruling to that effect, both Aumentado and Mayor Judith Cajes are still in the running as far as who is the ultimate official candidate is concerned.

The signatories assailed the national and provincial party leaderships for indifference to their cries. Yet, they affirmed that Chatto and other new Lakas officials have been constantly calling meetings in municipal and barangay levels. This is precisely the kind of participative governance and leadership Chatto has been known for, and in which the leaders down the grassroot level are consulted on party concerns. Despite being notified of meetings, the party dissenters refused to honor the invitation.  Worst, they labeled by alibi their interest-serving absence as the root of their own confusion.

For one, the visit of presidential aspirant Gibo Teodoro has offered us a glimpse of their mask and sinister attitude. For how could they ever explain their meeting with Villar in Cebu City on February 21, 2010 while Teodoro and the rest of the loyal Lakas partymates gathered in Balilihan on the birthday celebration of Chatto?  Due notices were sent. Who, then, are the hypocrites, treacherous, liars and excusers by alibis?

It is disheartening that these self-claimed victims of hypocrisy and treachery maliciously and advertently gain mandate in all their political dealings.

This leads us to the inevitable question: How could they have done all these if indeed they have been loyal to the party all these years?


6.   That Chatto's leadership is inutile and ineffective. 

          Leadership is one issue we love the people to decide.  It is, modesty
aside, one argument that we can hardly lose.  But the issue here is not about leadership. It is rather about a GRAND DESIGN of DECEPTION and DISLOYALTY---or LOYALTY TO INTEREST---by creating 2 slates to serve Lakas less and satisfy NP more.  Or is it feeding NP with Lakas food?


7.   That the signatories are treated second-class citizens in the Lakas Party.
   
This is another patent alibi in laying the predicate of their argument for bolting Lakas and, happily, campaign for NP in the open.  Everybody in the party is treated equally.


8.   That Aumentado lost in 2004 elections in Balilihan.

Aumentado lost in Balilihan not just in 2004 election but also in 2001.  But here is the fairest equation. COMELEC records show that in the 2001 election, Aumentado lost in Balilihan by 2,253 votes when then Vice Gov. Chatto and Gov. Relampagos were in tandem.  Relampagos lost in the Bohol-wide count. In their 2004 rematch, Aumentado, already the governor, lost to Relampagos by only 52 votes in the same town. Hence, he won 2201 more votes in Balilihan over the same opponent in their second and final fight.  Aumentado got the additional huge vote when he and Chatto joined on account of the then unification.  And figures won’t lie.   


9.   That Chatto will benefit from the support of LDP Candidates in some towns.

      Records should be put straight that Chatto never called Relampagos to
issue LDP CONAs to opponents of Lakas candidates.  Instead, it was Aumentado who called Relampagos to issue LDP CONAs to the mayoralty candidates in Ubay and Getafe.  In fact, Chatto was surprised why no Lakas CONA was requested by Aumentado from national Lakas for the Getafe candidate when Aumentado himself facilitated the release of the CONA photocopies from the National Lakas Office for Dagohoy and Talibon.  This was evidenced by his text message addressed to the National Office for the CONAs of Dagohoy and Talibon only.


        These are NOT excuses and alibis.  These are RELIABLE FACTS---the PLAIN TRUTH. 
 
 We believe that when conscience is threatened by extreme short supply, we must frustrate all attempts to poison the people’s mind.  With strong mutual faith and trust---and being a people endowed with intellect that cannot fail for good ends---we cannot miscalculate our fate.

 We are convinced more than ever that between hypocrisy and deception, it always comforts to choose truth.  By this conviction we, therefore, declare and reiterate, with all the might of our conscience and capacities, to stay one and committed under the party leadership of our gubernatorial standard bearer Cong. Edgar M. Chatto.  HE IS THE BEST TO LEAD BOHOL  next no matter how worst the lies against us and the people.

   In this prelude to another mandate come election day, we can only ask
for God’s wisdom and guidance.


PADAYON BOL-ANON


Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0


bella05

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1236 on: March 16, 2010, 02:30:09 PM »
BE HONEST:( Cong Chatto)

Release the list of the P630-M total pork barrel spending in nine years.

Make a public accounting of where the P70-M pork barrel funds last year went.

Explain to the people why the amount of computer cost P170,000 EACH.

Tell the people HONESTLY what is the motive behind giving cell phones to the barangay Captains in 2nd District.

Be Honest. Tubaga ni.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

Lexmar

  • BANNED
  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 485
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1237 on: March 16, 2010, 05:38:55 PM »
hahaha... ag arki, bakak ra gyud tawn ang masyagit....hahahaha,

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

willmerit

  • EXPERT
  • ***
  • Posts: 3621
  • smile!
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1238 on: March 16, 2010, 10:50:39 PM »
nganong mauwaw man ko!? hahaha di jud ko mauwaw mo sulti ana kay dili gyud corrupt si herrera...




are u sure nga dili corrupt?  pagsure oi kay naa raba koy makatestify ana, botante raba sila then apil na sila sa nakawork didto sa cultural sa calape.  dili nalang ko moelaborate kay  mao gihapon tabunan man ninyo.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22737.0

faithal

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 172
    • View Profile
Re: Edgar Chatto vs Julius Caesar Herrera in 2010
« Reply #1239 on: March 16, 2010, 11:45:37 PM »

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Tags: