Author Topic: Jurisdiction is conferred upon the court, not the judge  (Read 1094 times)

MikeLigalig.com

  • FOUNDER
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 33284
  • Please use the share icons below
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Tickets on a Budget
Jurisdiction is conferred upon the court, not the judge
« on: November 15, 2016, 08:31:37 PM »
Explain the rule that jurisdiction is conferred upon the court, not the judge.

ANSwer: The jurisdiction is vested in the court, not in the judges. When a case is filed in one branch, jurisdiction over the case does
not attach to the branch or judge alone to the exclusion of the other branches. Trial may be held or proceedings continue by and before another branch or judge. The apportionment
and distribution of cases do not involve a grant or limitation of jurisdiction; the jurisdiction attaches and continues to be
vested in the CFI (now RTC) of the province, and the trials may be held by any branch or judge of the court. (Bacalso v. Ramolete, 21 SCRA 519, October 26,1967; Bala v. Martinez, 181 SCRA 459; Hasegawa, et al. v. Kitamura, G.R. No. 149177

TUBAGBOHOL.com can now be accessed on mobile phones via Tapatalk App both in Android and Apple OS.



Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=83209.0
John 3:16-18 ESV
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son (Jesus Christ), that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.

👉 GET easy and FAST online loan at www.tala.com Philippines

Book tickets anywhere for planes, trains, boats, bus at www.12go.co

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Tags: