normal_post - Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review - Philippine Laws Author Topic: Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review  (Read 1442 times)

MIKELIGALIG.com

  • FOUNDER
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • avatar_1382_1499847132 - Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review - Philippine Laws
  • Posts: 24576
  • medal1 - Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review - Philippine Lawsmedal2 - Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review - Philippine Lawsmedal3 - Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review - Philippine Laws
  • NEED A WEBSITE? email me: info@mikeligalig.com
    • Share Post
xx - Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review - Philippine Laws
Difficult Bar Exam Question: Criminal Law Review
« on: December 18, 2009, 06:43:38 PM »
Jose employed Mario as gardener and Henry as cook. They learned that Jose won P500,000.00 in the lotto, and decided to rob him. Mario positioned himself about 30 meters away from Jose’s house and acted as lookout. For his part, Henry surreptitiously gained entry into the house and killed Jose who was then having his dinner. Henry found the P500,000.00 and took it. Henry then took a can of gasoline from the garage and burned the house to conceal the acts. Mario and Henry fled, but were arrested around 200 meters away from the house by alert barangay tanods. The tanods recovered the P500,000.00.

Mario and Henry were charged with and convicted of robbery with homicide, with the aggravating circumstances of arson, dwelling, and nighttime. Mario moved to reconsider the decision maintaining that he was not at the scene of the crime and was not aware that Henry killed the victim; hence, he was guilty only of robbery, as an accomplice. Mario also claimed that he conspired with Henry to commit robbery but not to kill Jose. Henry, likewise, moved to reconsider the decision, asserting that he is liable only for attempted robbery with homicide with no aggravating circumstance, considering that he and Mario did not benefit from the P500,000.00. He further alleged that arson is a felony and not an aggravating circumstance; dwelling is not aggravating in attempted robbery with homicide; and nighttime is not aggravating because the house of Jose was lighted at the time he was killed.

Resolve with reasons the respective motions of Mario and Henry. (7%)

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=24371.0
Romans 10:9-10
"If you declare with your mouth, Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved."

Where to Stay in Bohol? Book at Dao Diamond Hotel and Restaurant in Tagbilaran City. Online reservation at: https://www.daodiamond.com

Powered by 12Go Asia system


Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via pinterest Share via reddit Share via twitter
 

Powered by 12Go Asia system

Sign-up or Log-in Free

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Latest Topics

Gotcha! by hubag bohol
[Today at 01:10:28 PM]


Do you want to live in a tree house? by hubag bohol
[Today at 01:06:39 PM]


The whole kit and caboodle by hubag bohol
[Today at 01:03:11 PM]


Social distancing while socializing by hubag bohol
[Today at 01:00:15 PM]


Metrobank Advisory by MIKELIGALIG.com
[Today at 01:00:12 PM]


China’s success in stopping pandemic a sheer fabrication by hubag bohol
[Today at 11:59:59 AM]


Norwegian Marine Scholarship by MIKELIGALIG.com
[Today at 05:44:58 AM]


Business Incubation Program by MIKELIGALIG.com
[Today at 05:43:24 AM]


I made $4556 today by balong
[Today at 03:38:18 AM]


NBA games suspended by balong
[Today at 03:27:06 AM]

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Powered by SMFPacks SEO Pro Mod | Sitemap
Mobile View
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2020, SimplePortal