Join MikeLigalig.com!

Why Just Read When You Can Join, Post, and Read!

Lawyer of Ampatuan says Bullets Were Planted in Massacre Victims' Bodies

Started by MikeLigalig.com, February 25, 2011, 12:42:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MikeLigalig.com

Note: Now you know why some lawyers have difficulty going to heaven.

By Julie M. Aurelio
Philippine Daily Inquirer

A defense lawyer in the Maguindanao massacre case Thursday raised the possibility that metal fragments recovered from two victims did not come from bullets but were surgical implants.

Lawyer Paris Real posed this question Thursday to Dr. Ruperto Sumbilon, a forensic expert of the National Bureau of Investigation who conducted the autopsies on the cadavers of Rasul Daud and Norton Edsa, two of the 56 victims of the Nov. 23, 2009 massacre.

In his testimony on his autopsy of the two victims on Wednesday, Sumbilon told Judge Jocelyn Solis-Reyes the two had died of multiple gunshot wounds.

Real asked Sumbilon if, not being a ballistician, he could tell with certainty if the supposed metal fragments were from bullets or surgical implants.

“I am not a ballistician,” Sumbilon answered.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son (Jesus Christ), that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. - John 3:16-18

● ● ● ●
MOST AFFORDABLE health insurance HMO in the Philippines. Learn more at https://kwik.insure/at/mligalig

Lorenzo

Quote from: TUBAGBOHOL.com on February 25, 2011, 12:42:49 PM
Note: Now you know why some lawyers have difficulty going to heaven.

By Julie M. Aurelio
Philippine Daily Inquirer

A defense lawyer in the Maguindanao massacre case Thursday raised the possibility that metal fragments recovered from two victims did not come from bullets but were surgical implants.

Lawyer Paris Real posed this question Thursday to Dr. Ruperto Sumbilon, a forensic expert of the National Bureau of Investigation who conducted the autopsies on the cadavers of Rasul Daud and Norton Edsa, two of the 56 victims of the Nov. 23, 2009 massacre.

In his testimony on his autopsy of the two victims on Wednesday, Sumbilon told Judge Jocelyn Solis-Reyes the two had died of multiple gunshot wounds.

Real asked Sumbilon if, not being a ballistician, he could tell with certainty if the supposed metal fragments were from bullets or surgical implants.

“I am not a ballistician,” Sumbilon answered.

Interesting.
www.kwikcare-philcare.com - Most affordable HMO Health Insurance in the Philippines

Lorenzo

tsk tsk tsk, "possibility that metal fragments recovered from two victims did not come from bullets but were surgical implants.."

oh yes, the patients would elect to have metal fragments installed in their bodies (and in the process probably acquire tetanus toxins...), before their untimely deaths.

oh yes, i see the logistics in that.  ::)
www.kwikcare-philcare.com - Most affordable HMO Health Insurance in the Philippines