MikeLigalig.com

The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that Ang Ladlad can take part in the May 10 elections, but a Catholic Church official believes that the party-list group professing to represent what it calls the “gays, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)” sector should not be allowed to enter Congress, and said he would discourage people from voting for it.

Caloocan Bishop Deogracias Iñiguez, chair of the committee on public affairs of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines, said the Catholic Church disagreed with the Supreme Court ruling.

He added that accrediting Ang Ladlad as a party-list group would encourage an “abnormality.”

“We recognize them, respect them, but their situation is an abnormality. Allowing them to have a chance to take a seat in Congress is approving and encouraging an abnormality which is unnatural,” Iniguez told reporters. - inquirer.net

ahahahaha...ok ra na bishop. aron pod naay mopaluyo sa among mga gipangbati ba.

OT: naa man diay poy party-list sa mga manindahay og LPG. bisag unsa naman ning nag-pa-representar diay sa congreso. hahhahahaha.

hala botohi: LPG-MA Partylist. alang sa pag-konrolar sa presyo sa LPG. hehehe

Gado bay Glace, kontrol ba gud nga mahal man gihapon. Hehehehehe

Adto ka sa mga balut vendors ba to nga partylist, ang representative kay ang anak ni Gloria.

Quote from: taga tigbao on April 10, 2010, 09:38:33 AM
Gado bay Glace, kontrol ba gud nga mahal man gihapon. Hehehehehe

Adto ka sa mga balut vendors ba to nga partylist, ang representative kay ang anak ni Gloria.

wahahaha...klaro na kaayo nang balot partylist kung anak man ni Gloria ang rep...unsa may ilang plata-porma kaha pod.

Quote from: glacier_71 on April 10, 2010, 09:44:44 AM
wahahaha...klaro na kaayo nang balot partylist kung anak man ni Gloria ang rep...unsa may ilang plata-porma kaha pod.

Mao ganing dakung pangutana kay way plataporma unja wa representation sa MARGINALIZED SECTOR ang midagan as representative plus the fact pa nga ang maong anak ni Gloring modagan pud sa pagkakongresman sa Pampanga. Imagine, duhay ijahang daganan, as congressman sa Pampanga ug as representative sa partylist, win or loss asa aning duha. Hehehehehe.

Ag comment pud sa Supreme Court okay ra kono. Hasta appointments sa Sandiganbayan puwede gihapon. Daghang technicalities nga nalutsan ni si Gloring, kinahanglan jud ug charter amendments o di ganing change sa mga provisions plus CLEAR interpretations of the law.

Mamakwit unja ta ani puhon.

gikigwa na jud ning nasura hahahahhaha

Gays, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)” sector banned in Congress?


OMG ka-IGNORANTE!

hadlok sila og puro na mokiay ang naas congreso...ubay-ubay ra ba pod ang mga kongresista nga b***t tingali.

Quote from: glacier_71 on April 10, 2010, 11:41:11 AM
hadlok sila og puro na mokiay ang naas congreso...ubay-ubay ra ba pod ang mga kongresista nga b***t tingali.

mao jud Glace! hahahahha!

naa pay hapit na ma-presidente nga medyo, mokiay pod. hahahahaha

Quote from: glacier_71 on April 10, 2010, 11:51:32 AM
naa pay hapit na ma-presidente nga medyo, mokiay pod. hahahahaha

hala kinsa nila Glace? si Noynoy???

Quote from: ms da binsi on April 10, 2010, 12:03:33 PM
hala kinsa nila Glace? si Noynoy???

hahahahaha...mangutana tang Buwad og unsay tinood ani. hehehe

ASA NAMAN SI BUWAD TOOD?

This is a super hypocracy!  They should see to it  (catholic church) that sexually molesting kids should be stopped once and for all!

with due respect, i guess the opinion of the catholic church (in the philippines) as expressed by the bishop has nothing to do with GLBT sexual preferences and practices as it has nothing to do with sinners from among its clergy. 

clearly the reason stated by the bishop is that this sector is 'abnormal' (please note that it did not say 'sinful'), and the church [perhaps] is simply reiterating its stand that what is 'abnormal' (in the biblical and biological sense) must not be encouraged. 

whether such stand is fair or unfair, hypocritical or truthful, is beside the point.  the church as a church has to have a stand on social issues involving its flock, and thus has it made its stand against GLBT's recognition as a sector worthy of legislative representation.   

the church is a church and its laws should stay in the church and the church should not make the law for the state.

certainly.  (separation of church and state has been around.)  that's why the church is only expressing its opinion.   

Quote from: islander on April 10, 2010, 11:39:36 PM
certainly.  (separation of church and state has been around.)  that's why the church is only expressing its opinion.  

pero nangaghap ang church ug tumanon kon maohon?  

mao toy giingon nga "THERES NO HARM IN TRYING"

nice try though. but its just not right.

mura ra sad na ug DILI PWEDE ANG BADIDAT MAG PARI.

ug nganong di nalang gud angkonon sa church sa ato nga ang third sex is not abnormal but  human being.

HUMAN BEING!!!!!




btw, what if the state would say :"Gays should be  banned in priesthood?" i have several gay priest friends whom i really love and adored, bless their heart.

pro-gay and lesbian gyud ko.. its not their fault kay sa genes man gyud nila na....

unsay banned? ..... kadaghan b***t diha sa kongresso, sauna pa.

Quote from: nat-cast on April 11, 2010, 03:55:59 AM
unsay banned? ..... kadaghan b***t diha sa kongresso, sauna pa.

sama pananglit nih??? (tsismis mode )

open secret

Quote from: ms da binsi on April 11, 2010, 12:03:01 AM
pero nangaghap ang church ug tumanon kon maohon?  

mao toy giingon nga "THERES NO HARM IN TRYING"

nice try though. but its just not right.

mura ra sad na ug DILI PWEDE ANG BADIDAT MAG PARI.

ug nganong di nalang gud angkonon sa church sa ato nga ang third sex is not abnormal but  human being.

HUMAN BEING!!!!!




btw, what if the state would say :"Gays should be  banned in priesthood?" i have several gay priest friends whom i really love and adored, bless their heart.

hehe, makalingaw imong logic, ms da binsi.  paskang tuod kung masumbalikan ang church.  on the other hand, it has been part of our country's tradition for the church to make known its stand on issues that have direct bearing on the people at large.  so it has made known its stand on an issue that has very real repercussions, in this case the sectoral representation for GLBTs. 

yes, GLBTs are human; they may even be better humans than some humans we know.  but it's not their humanness that's taken to task by the church; it's their representation as a sector in the legislature.  causes, like labor and the environment, are understandably in need of representation.  perhaps in the opinion of the church GLBTs are not in need of such.  (say, do salesgirls or those with down syndrome need to be represented in congress as sectors?)  in the first place, the GLBT's rights as human beings are already covered by laws that govern the rest of us.

               

Quote from: islander on April 12, 2010, 12:05:00 AM
hehe, makalingaw imong logic, ms da binsi.  paskang tuod kung masumbalikan ang church.  on the other hand, it has been part of our country's tradition for the church to make known its stand on issues that have direct bearing on the people at large.  so it has made known its stand on an issue that has very real repercussions, in this case the sectoral representation for GLBTs. 

yes, GLBTs are human; they may even be better humans than some humans we know.  but it's not their humanness that's taken to task by the church; it's their representation as a sector in the legislature.  causes, like labor and the environment, are understandably in need of representation.  perhaps in the opinion of the church GLBTs are not in need of such.  (say, do salesgirls or those with down syndrome need to be represented in congress as sectors?)  in the first place, the GLBT's rights as human beings are already covered by laws that govern the rest of us.

               

good point there, islander.