V. Respondent committed culpable violations of the Constitution through wanton arbitrariness and partiality in consistently disregarding the principle of res judicata and in deciding in favor of gerry-mandering in the cases involving the 16 newly created cities, and the promotion of Dinagat Island into a province.a. Were not the League of Cities case and the Dinagat case collegial decisions upholding acts of Congress? Were the laws involved statutory responses of Congress to the people as “master†as against the greed of the League of Cities?
b. Was not the Fasap (Flight Attendants and Stewards Association of the Philippines) decision also collegial?
c. Is the Supreme Court powerless to look into the activities of its members (e.g., plagiarism) especially if it involves things that might affect the reputation of the Court?
d. Was not the creation of new districts in Camarines Sur done by Congress, the representative of the people?
e. Who decides the application of the principle of proportionality (or “one man, one voteâ€) in the size of districts?
Linkback:
https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=45804.0