Di man tingali pwede sa third person ang Cogito Ergo Sum as a philosophical proof of one's existence, kay kini si GEC, libugon man ta niya to think that he exists,
therefore I am (NOTE ang conclusion is still,
I am, not
He is). Tan-awa ra gud, magpatim-aw lang ni si GEC kung dudahan na iyang existence... Let's just wait...
hahahahaha...to be or not to be.
i am not really sure what is in that "being". should i lean upon the Cogito Ergo Sum of Decartes, or rely upon my existentialist instinct. besides we're all by-products of this cyber machine that collects only seminal ideas which may never grow. because we sometimes say words that are empty or no being. so it is mystifying as it is hollow. yet, we presume it is BEING because we're led to believe, He Thinks Therefore He is.
Linkback:
https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=22700.0