Author Topic: Interpretation of Ezra 2:63  (Read 522 times)

MikeLigalig.com

  • FOUNDER
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 33317
  • Please use the share icons below
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Tickets on a Budget
Interpretation of Ezra 2:63
« on: July 05, 2020, 10:06:37 AM »
Ezra 2:63 explained by Adam Clarke
Verse 63. The Tirshatha] This is generally supposed to be Nehemiah, or the person who was the commandant; see Neh 8:9; Neh 10:1 (refs2), for the word appears to be the name of an office. The Vulgate and Septuagint write it Atershatha, the Syriac and Arabic render it the princes of Judah. Some suppose the word to be Persian, but nothing like it of the same import occurs in that language at present. If, as Castel supposed, it signifies austerity, or that fear which is unpressed by the authority of a governor, it may come from [Persian] ters, FEAR, or [Persian] tersh, ACID, the former from [Persian] tarsidan, to FEAR or DREAD.

Should not eat of the most holy things] There was a high priest then, but no Urim and Thummim, these having been lost in the captivity.



☆ START YOUR OWN blog site, business or personal website, or e-commerce store at www.fastcomet.com ☆



Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=114291.0
John 3:16-18 ESV
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son (Jesus Christ), that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.

👉 GET easy and FAST online loan at www.tala.com Philippines

Book tickets anywhere for planes, trains, boats, bus at www.12go.co

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Tags: