
Mga 'Sana/o .....
Hinaut dili unta mahimangud ang atong bangiitang arkitektong Lobocanon, si Bobby Cericos niining akong ubos nga komentaryo.
Hangtud sa panganod ang akong pagdayeg ni Angelo "Geloy" Balili (laing Lobocanon) sa iyang pagdumili mo-apil sa bugnong lugaynon dinhi sa ato bisan pa nga halos isupa kaniya ang pagka congressman sa terciro distrito. Ang iyang gipakita usa ka buhat nga matawag ug "highest degree of statesmanship" (however extremely wanting in another Lobocanon).
Ngano nga si Geloy wala motuman sa mga nagtsutsuwa kaniya? Matud niya sa iyang balibad nga namantala, dili niya matulon ang pamaagi sa pamulitika sa Bohol !!!!!
Unta, wala na lang mag-usik ug panahon si Bobby sa iyang paglangsar pagka gobernador sa Bohol. Hinu-on, tingali hibalo na si Bobby ug unsay iyang dangatan. He might just be trying to prove a point! Pero, sa laing bahin iya lamang gihatagan ug bili ang kuno demokratikong pamaagi sa pagpili ug gobernador sa Bohol. Unfortunately, Bobby only lent an air of legitimacy to the democratic processs of elections in Bohol for governor when in fact it was already down the drain, considering that the Boholanos had been deprived of the right of choice after our political elite made their so-called "unity ticket" supposedly for Bohol's dev't and progress!
Ani-ay artikulo akong gisukip sa ubos. Palihug basaha ug pamaladongi .......
==============================
A difficult process
Adrian E. Cristobal
Democracy makes possible the reform of institutions without using violence. — Karl K. Popper
Mr. Christopher Hill, the US Assistant Secretary for East Asia and Pacific Affairs, gave us something to think about when he said that democracy (is) a difficult process.
"Process" means a series of actions towards a particular aim. So if democracy is a process, its particular aim is a political society which promotes life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Other desirable things follow: justice, equality, freedom, all of which are summed up in the Rule of Law.
Note, however, that despotism, the considered opposite of democracy, also have laws, but they are regarded by democracies as arbitrary or dependent on the whim and will of one man or group of men.
The immediate question, then, is what makes democracy a difficult process? Perhaps, that is not the correct question? Perhaps, the correct question is who finds democracy a difficult process?
Is it the people? I have heard ordinary citizens complain that what’s wrong with our country is "too much democracy," by which they mean their fellow citizens argue too much that they can’t unite for a common purpose. And what’s the common purpose? To move the nation forward.
If it’s the people who find the process difficult, is it because they don’t know what democracy should be?
How is that when it’s all there in our constitutions?
What makes the process so difficult when in fact we know or believe we know what democracy is all about? Are the people putting roadblocks to the process? Is it a case of the governed defying those to whom they gave their consent to govern — or the reverse?
Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=411.0