Microsoft
pCloud Premium

Despite acquittal, Trump clearly guilty, Judge Napolitano writes

  • 8 replies
  • 343 views
*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Re: Despite acquittal, Trump clearly guilty, Judge Napolitano writes
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2020, 01:34:12 AM »

And in its wake is a Congress ceding power to the presidency, almost as if the states had ratified a constitutional amendment redefining the impeachment language to permit a president to engage in high crimes and misdemeanors so long as he believes that they are in the national interest and so long as his party has an iron-clad grip on the Senate.

How could presidential crimes be in the national interest? Here is the backstory.

When the House of Representatives voted in favor of two articles of impeachment against Trump, it characterized his lawlessness as contempt of Congress and an abuse of power.

The contempt of Congress consisted of Trump's orders to subordinates to disregard congressional subpoenas. Both Republican- and Democratic-controlled Houses of Representatives have deemed such presidential instructions in an impeachment inquiry as impeachable per se.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=92113.msg662215#msg662215
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Re: Despite acquittal, Trump clearly guilty, Judge Napolitano writes
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2020, 01:35:22 AM »

The abuse allegations address Trump's solicitation of assistance for his reelection campaign from a foreign government by holding up the release of $391 million in military aid to the same foreign government. These funds were congressionally appropriated and ordered to be paid by legislation that Trump had signed into law.

Federal law prohibits such solicitation as criminal and prohibits government officials from seeking personal favors in return for performing their governmental duties. The latter is bribery.

Because the solicitation that Trump committed was a crime against the government, it is among those referred to when the Constitution was written as a "high" crime. High crimes are a constitutional basis for impeachment, along with bribery and treason.

The evidence that Trump did this is overwhelming and beyond a reasonable doubt, and no one with firsthand knowledge denied it. Numerous government officials recounted that the presidential leverage of $391 million in U.S. assistance for a personal political favor did occur and the government's own watchdog concluded that it was indisputably unlawful.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=92113.msg662216#msg662216
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Re: Despite acquittal, Trump clearly guilty, Judge Napolitano writes
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2020, 01:35:53 AM »

The favor Trump sought was an announcement by the Ukrainian government of the commencement of an investigation of Trump's potential presidential foe, former Vice President Joe Biden.

While the Senate was hearing House prosecution managers argue their case, and Trump's lawyers challenged those arguments, The New York Times revealed that John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser, had authored an as yet unpublished book demonstrating that the House case against Trump was true.

True because, unlike the senators who shut their eyes and ears at Trump's trial, Bolton saw for himself the presidential tit-for-tat machinations that the House had alleged and, if proven, were criminal and impeachable.

The Times also revealed the existence of 24 emails sent by Trump aides manifesting indisputably his lawless behavior. But the emails are secret.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=92113.msg662217#msg662217
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Re: Despite acquittal, Trump clearly guilty, Judge Napolitano writes
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2020, 01:39:35 AM »

How? By manipulating Senate Republicans to bar firsthand evidence and keep it from senatorial and public scrutiny, Trump and his Senate collaborators have insulated him and future presidents from the moral and constitutional truism that no president is above the law.

Somewhere, Richard Nixon is smiling.


Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel.


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=92113.msg662220#msg662220
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

islander

  • *****
  • 46859
  • If you're from Pluto, you're welcome.
Republic Act 8485 (Animal Welfare Act of 1998, Philippines), as amended and strengthened by House  Bill 6893 of 2013--- violation means a maximum of P250,000 fine with a corresponding three-year jail term and a minimum of P30,000 fine and six months imprisonment

*

hubag bohol

  • *****
  • 89925
  • "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool...
...than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln

 

pCloud Premium