meanwhile, it's like looking at a glass of water as either half-full or half-empty. initial media reports may have presented the tiff as half-full. considering that often as not some media practitioners may opt for the sensational report that could stir the public, the half-full angle is too good to let pass.
the official yarn is it's half-empty. again, it's understandable as any official is compelled to go the way of damage control considering that the provincial government must not be perceived as a disunited circus of legislators ignorant of anger management.
what difference does it make to the public whether such rift happened or not? it has a choice of what report to believe in anyway and it won't make bohol any less.
the receiver of the alleged flying glass of water herself had said that no such flying glass was conjured. come to think of it, she must be lawyer enough to know that if such physical 'abuse' did happen, she can always go to court. if she's not complaining, why should we?
