This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Lorenzo on February 28, 2008, 03:30:10 AM
Oh i wish i would be able to see such technology in the future.
Human colonization of other worlds. A Human Galactic Empire.
Sounds so Star Trekky, but I like it!
Quote from: slackware on February 28, 2008, 03:05:55 AM
By then, humans might have moved on to another planet capable of sustaining life!
Quote from: BlueAngel on February 27, 2008, 07:27:52 PMQuote from: orChids on February 27, 2008, 02:52:53 PM
agoy tabanga!
Quote from: svetlana on February 27, 2008, 12:38:42 PMQuote from: ms da binsi on February 27, 2008, 12:30:53 PM
aguy naa na sad prospect si Shiela!
go Shiela, go!
Ms. Belle, si coco kay engage na! wahahaha
Quote from: orChids on February 27, 2008, 12:50:22 PM
hahahaha funny cartoons.Thanks da binsi dear.My baby enjoyed watching with me.
Quote from: alfonso_potane on February 27, 2008, 12:57:16 PM
WOW KANINDOT ... AKO SA DAMGO LANG GYUD MAKA ANHA ...DAPITA
Quote from: Lorenzo on February 27, 2008, 01:00:13 PMQuote from: ms da binsi on February 27, 2008, 12:07:21 PM
CO2, NO2,NO3 or whatever...
the world itself is too populated, would you agree??
the law of supply and demand, know what i mean?
bottom line there's too much going on with our planet whether you inhale/exhale gas, fart or whatever...
just too much people now on earth that causes this what they called the Global Warming...
whether it is Global Warming or not, WE are now destroying our planet EARTH...
WE...
That is just the problem. There are too many humans. Over 6 billion and growing.
Humans species is unnatural in a way, we have completely checked any natural predators that would have checked our population. Even natural 'checks' such as diseases and plagues, are being defeated by medical advancements. It almost relates to the Malthusian Theory where natural resource abundance constant and human population was growing assymetrically that it would someday surmount over the resrource population. I took a class that focused on this, loved it, but any ways back to the subject, human population growth is a violation of natural law. In biology, the theory asserts that the reproductive potential of virtually any organism or species greatly exceeds the earth's capacity to support all its possible offspring. Consequently, species diversity is preserved through mechanisms that keep population sizes in check, such as predation. These mechanisms are typhoons, hurricanes, plagues, drought, infertility.
Man has already defeated most of these mechanisms, or has developed instruments to reduce the damage effects of said mechanisms. Thereby precluding a maintenance of the positive linear population growth over any loss of life.
Interesting eh?
Quote from: Know Nothing on February 27, 2008, 08:26:25 AMQuote from: Lorenzo on February 27, 2008, 08:15:43 AMQuote from: Know Nothing on February 27, 2008, 07:38:09 AM
Hello Lorenzo,
First of all the issue of whether there is global warming is not up to politicians to decide whether they are liberal or conservative. Global warming is a science that should be left to scientists to decide whether it is happening or not. Politicians are just implementers of policy.
Most of the global warming studies have been based on models. What the paper you are deriding is challenging the previous global warming models. And if I may humbly mention, it has been said by one of the most respected modelers that “All models are wrong, but some are useful†(G.E.P Box). As far as saying that it is accepted by all scientists that global warming is happening, that is a crock!
If you have been doing research on global warming can you please give your peer-reviewed publications that we can read and then make up our minds?
The research paper that I am conducting, which is funded by the Pennsylvania Department of Energy and is a joint thesis paper. I have a thread on it in the Research Cooler if you want to read about it.
Additionally, perhaps you misjudged the point of my post, as it was in condemnation of Political figures of certain nations, which are responsible for the qualitative effects in response to this ecological and biogeochemical response. Perhaps you may have not noticed this, but nation states INFLUENCE global warming, in fact many nation states have directly contributed to the depravation of the stratosphere, atmosphere, ecological environment in terms of unnatural chemical increases in said environment. Politicians, hold the power to either change this course, the laws they pass can either be pro-environment or anti-environment.
A minute case study to verse you in this, is the European Industrialization during the late 18th century to the 19th century, which utilized rare natural resources (non-renewable, such as coal, which also lead to the eutrofication, as well as death to limnoaquatic sites and metals poisoning of localities), the American industrialization, the ongoing global industrialization and the lack of regulation boards in said nation states such as India and China (which are promoting this problem) as well as the United States (the largest consumer of raw natural resources).
As a scientist, and as a research colleague with other academians, I beg to differ in your post.
Read, research before you talk. Only fools defy the proofs that science dictates, it is blind idiocy.
Here is a link
http://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=4982.0Quote from: Lorenzo on February 27, 2008, 08:15:43 AMQuote from: Know Nothing on February 27, 2008, 07:38:09 AM
Hello Lorenzo,
First of all the issue of whether there is global warming is not up to politicians to decide whether they are liberal or conservative. Global warming is a science that should be left to scientists to decide whether it is happening or not. Politicians are just implementers of policy.
Most of the global warming studies have been based on models. What the paper you are deriding is challenging the previous global warming models. And if I may humbly mention, it has been said by one of the most respected modelers that “All models are wrong, but some are useful†(G.E.P Box). As far as saying that it is accepted by all scientists that global warming is happening, that is a crock!
If you have been doing research on global warming can you please give your peer-reviewed publications that we can read and then make up our minds?
The research paper that I am conducting, which is funded by the Pennsylvania Department of Energy and is a joint thesis paper. I have a thread on it in the Research Cooler if you want to read about it.
Additionally, perhaps you misjudged the point of my post, as it was in condemnation of Political figures of certain nations, which are responsible for the qualitative effects in response to this ecological and biogeochemical response. Perhaps you may have not noticed this, but nation states INFLUENCE global warming, in fact many nation states have directly contributed to the depravation of the stratosphere, atmosphere, ecological environment in terms of unnatural chemical increases in said environment. Politicians, hold the power to either change this course, the laws they pass can either be pro-environment or anti-environment.
A minute case study to verse you in this, is the European Industrialization during the late 18th century to the 19th century, which utilized rare natural resources (non-renewable, such as coal, which also lead to the eutrofication, as well as death to limnoaquatic sites and metals poisoning of localities), the American industrialization, the ongoing global industrialization and the lack of regulation boards in said nation states such as India and China (which are promoting this problem) as well as the United States (the largest consumer of raw natural resources).
As a scientist, and as a research colleague with other academians, I beg to differ in your post.
Read, research before you talk. Only fools defy the proofs that science dictates, it is blind idiocy.
Here is a link
http://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=4982.0
That is great that you are conducting this research. Until you evaluate your data and publish it in a peer reviewed publication, I am sorry to say that all you have at this time is mere speculation. There are a lot of research going on in this world ( including the research for a cure of many forms of cancer!). Until somebody has a replicatable solution (meaning other scientists can use the Scientific Method to verify the individual results), any results are just personal opinions. Like they say, opinions are like asses, evrybody has one.
Quote from: Know Nothing on February 27, 2008, 08:18:04 AM
No you do not need anybody to tell you what is happening! Anybody can personally believe what they want to believe including that the earth is flat. The problem becomes when people start spouting ideas and scientifically unfounded hypotheses that are bound to change local, national and international policies that will divert billions and trillions of dollars to fruitless courses. I am not against global warming per se. I am against self centered proclamations, having no scientific basis, closed as science.
Quote from: ..yadz.. on June 19, 2007, 03:05:25 PM
wise man gud ang mga women when it comes to money and kabalo sad mo tipid...
Quote from: Ginger on February 26, 2008, 05:36:43 PM
A woman over 40 will never wake you in the middle of the night and ask, "What are you thinking?" She doesn't care what you think. If a woman over 40 doesn't want to watch the game, she doesn't sit around whining about it. She does something she wants to do, and it's usually more interesting. Women over 40 are dignified. They seldom have a screaming match with you at the opera or in the middle of an expensive restaurant. Of course, if you deserve it, they won't hesitate to shoot you if they think they can get away with it. Older women are generous with praise, often undeserved. They know what it's like to be unappreciated. Women get psychic as they age. You never have to confess your sins to a woman over 40. Once you get past a wrinkle or two, a woman over 40 is far sexier than her younger counterpart. Older women are forthright and honest. They'll tell you right off if you are a jerk if you are acting like one. You don't ever have to wonder where you stand with her. Yes, we praise women over 40 for a multitude of reasons. Unfortunately, it's not reciprocal. For every stunning, smart, well-coiffed, hot woman over 40, there is a bald, paunchy relic in yellow pants making a fool of himself with some 22-year old waitress. Ladies, I apologize. For all those men who say, "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?", here's an update for you. Nowadays 80% of women are against marriage. Why? Because women realize it's not worth buying an entire pig just to get a little sausage!
Quote from: Mari on February 26, 2008, 11:22:40 PM
sakit man tuod ng dili ka dayunon og pakasal pero mas sakit ng pakaslan ka pero tua sa lain ang heart and mind. i would rather bear all the kauwaw and the pain abir kausa ra man but i dont wanna live it all my life
Quote from: Happy on February 26, 2008, 05:14:34 AM
Belle naa diay kay allergy? Sa unsa manka ma allergy?
Quote from: servant mikebohol on February 25, 2008, 08:40:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL6hyeqcrj0
Kapaligiran by Asin. Unforgettable. So unforgettable. I feel nostalgic now.
Quote from: Mari on February 26, 2008, 01:05:07 AM
asa man diay ni ipaprint, pede ba kita magpalit sa t-shirt nya printing nalang ang bayran?
Quote from: Brownman on February 25, 2008, 12:57:01 AM
Ms Belle i do knew nga one of your favorite ang Journey mao nga gui pm taka
insakto si Ms. Haze naa pay Chile tour sila karung 02/24/08 Viña del Mar Casino, Municipal Grand Hotel, naa silay interpreter kay spaniol man dihang dipata sa south america.
Quote from: changed on February 22, 2008, 11:43:35 PM
si rosette mascarinas
Quote from: slackware on February 25, 2008, 12:09:14 AM
i guess not all here buy my "sincere" apology daw kuno for many reasons... funny!
Quote from: changed on February 22, 2008, 03:58:02 AM
my sincere apologies to asianfairy for what i did in the past...
Quote from: slackware on February 23, 2008, 05:06:53 AM
I don’t want to end up into racism but as far as I know, evil exist in different races no matter how rich or advance their civilizations are....(excerpt or based from smallville season 7) heheheheheheh
Quote from: slackware on February 23, 2008, 04:47:07 AM
Di man kay mga intsik ray nagbuhat ana ba.
