This story is the stuff of movies and melodramatic plays. One can always try to justify whatever a party to the story is doing, depending on whose side your sympathies lie. Sakto ba ko, Attorney? Whatever side you may be taking, mora ta ug nagtan-aw ug live nga prinsesa ng banyera, hehehe.
As "civilized" people, we know that if the wife of the politician is playing ball with the policeman, the right thing that should have been done was to file a case for adultery, di ba, Atty? We have a law for that. Or ug gusto jud magpakita sa iyang kasuko ang politician, sakpon niya unya patyon niya "in the act", di ba Atty.? Makapahungaw siya sa iyang kasuko, wala pay liability. Peligro lang ug maka-una ang polis ug pusil kay naa man poy armas lagi.
If the story as published is indeed true, then what the politician did was MURDER, plain and simple; no ifs, no buts. We know what the punishment is. The point is, one should not be allowed to get away with a criminal act, specially someone who has presented himself and is now actually performing the duties of a lawmaker.
As "civilized" people, we know that if the wife of the politician is playing ball with the policeman, the right thing that should have been done was to file a case for adultery, di ba, Atty? We have a law for that. Or ug gusto jud magpakita sa iyang kasuko ang politician, sakpon niya unya patyon niya "in the act", di ba Atty.? Makapahungaw siya sa iyang kasuko, wala pay liability. Peligro lang ug maka-una ang polis ug pusil kay naa man poy armas lagi.
If the story as published is indeed true, then what the politician did was MURDER, plain and simple; no ifs, no buts. We know what the punishment is. The point is, one should not be allowed to get away with a criminal act, specially someone who has presented himself and is now actually performing the duties of a lawmaker.