I hope I can be understood by my opinion favoring Erap. I am aware defending Erap is not the popular thing to do but I would rather be right than to be popular... so please bear with me and let not your heart be troubled.
Erap's opinion saying that; "jueteng should be legalized to address poverty in our country" is correct. His line of thinking did not waver and still as resolute as he was the president before. Legalizing jueteng is right because jueteng as we look at it today is the exploitation of the poor Filipinos by illegal gambling lords in our country. Gambling lords do not pay taxes to the government and those working for them as collectors are not paid a regular income and no insurance whatsoever. Jueteng is a poor's man gambling game where you can bet 25 cents to 5 pesos and the collector will come directly to every house in the barangay. If you compare that to the lotto of Morato with a minimum bet of 10 pesos bettors in the barrio don't have that amount everyday and it needs for them to go to the town center to bet in the electronic machine. A barrio folk don't have even money to pay for a tricyle fare... how much more betting on the lotto.
WN
as an opinion, your favoring of Erap's legalizing of jueteng is quite understandable. contrary to what you believe, however, in my opinion, your defending Erap's whim doesn't make you Right nor Unpopular. It may be heroic on your part to stand by the Actor; it is just one step short of being absurd for nothing in Jueteng--whether it is legal or illegal-- could address the chronic poverty of many Filipinos.
If to legalize gambling is to address poverty, then we would not have talked this problem again after lottery and bunch of other gamblings were warmly welcomed by our law makers. Trusting that jueteng taxes would uplift our government's treasury, I doubt its beneficence to the poor. Do you know where most of PAGCORS' profits go? Honestly, none of us know because the government--like Erap--don't want us to know. And i don't want to know either; sometimes being ignorant about it feels much better. But the whole nation had seen the historic Erap's trial has also something to do with that legalized gambling--and all its "glory"--which you imply as worth defending.
Almost 80 % of the people of this country occupy the lowest part of the pyramid--below poverty line. What does it mean to legal jueteng? Tell me. More jobs? or more kickbacks and more missing taxes? The problem is when the government legalizes a gambling activity in this country, it believes it's doing favor to the people. Actually, it is the opposite. And that's a shame.
On the other hand, we all are aware that illegal jueteng would only favor more to the financers and their protectors (police, politicians and the military). aside from that, its evil, both necessary and unnecessary, is just sending more poor people to the bottom of indigence and destitution. i can't argue with that. I trust you know better than i do.
Why legal jueteng of Erap is hardly acceptable to me? If many feel it's not going to work even at the behest of a good politician, more so, when it comes from the mouth of Joseph Estrada. Basing upon his credibility and political record during his presidency, i doubt if he has any greater good to offer than legalizing jueteng, which to me is merely his political maneuvering, knowing that gambling is deeply ensconced in the Filipino psyche. Many filipinos canonized him a 'saint' for saying that. Including you.
The case of Chavit is a blessing in disguise. It has revealed this president's disservice to this country, to which he once passionately promised, "walang kama-kamag-anak, walang kumare, walang kumpadre." It's not a issue whether Chavit was seeking for vindication or absolution for his gambling problem after exposing Erap; it was time just riped for the picking for all to realize something not morally right happening in the highest office of the country. After all, it's the case of good prevailing over evil.
peace
Glace
Linkback:
https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=23247.0