Author Topic: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget  (Read 3060 times)

pioneer

  • To God be the glory alone
  • FOUNDER
  • GURU
  • *****
  • Posts: 18911
  • stay at home
    • View Profile
    • spiritual preparation
Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« on: September 01, 2007, 08:48:23 AM »
By Jes Tirol
Columnist
The Bohol Chronicle

Proem

The Province of Bohol is bruited as an agricultural province. Huge irrigation projects are constructed in Bohol to boost agricultural production. In other words, Bohol is self-sufficient in food products. Food is supposed to be available almost everywhere, be it in the farm or from the sea.

Plant-and-Forget

Today, there are two plants in Bohol that is "plant-and-forget then comeback-and-get." These are the coconut and the banana. You only plant it once and you can forget them and return only to harvest the fruits.

Rice was supposed to be a plant-and-forget affair. There is an old Bisayan word for it, ulilang. It means you plant dry-land rice, harvest it by cutting the stalks and new stalks will sprout again and you haverst again the new fruits. But it was forgotten long ago due to the popularity of the basak (rice paddies) type of rice production.

Historical Perspective

Throughout history, a community that is self-sufficient in food is always known to be progressive. After becoming self-sufficient in food the community tends to become self-sufficient in almost every other need.

The question is -- why is Bohol viewed as a poor province?

Agricultural Economics


When food is available, the other members of society not needed for food production becomes free to engage in producing other needed things. This situation was true during the Second World War. The Boholanos produced everything they needed, from food, clothing, soap, medicine, etc.

Again the question, why are we no longer producing by ourselves the other necessities in life?

Advent of Consumerism

Advanced countries, mainly the United States, developed the concept of consumerism. This concept changed the attitude of man from desiring only what they need, to desiring what they want. In fact it will change a desire to a need. Non-essentials like softdrinks are now thought of as a need.

When Coca Cola was first introduced in Bohol by the Americans, all street comers were supplied with coolers with Coca Cola. It was free and you can drink as much as you want. When the Boholanos learned to love the taste of Coca Cola, it was sold at a very low price in stores but free Coca Cola was still available at the town plaza. When people were transformed from "desiring" Coca Cola to "needing" Coca Cola, the item was then sold at the proper price to recoup the advertisement cost. Now you could not imagine a fiesta celebration without a softdrink.

Boholanos' Reaction

When the new need was developed the Boholanos' reaction was not to compete. Instead they turn to their farmlands to produce the cash needed to buy the softdrink. The old agricultural economics was altered to fit to the consumerism concept.

Why did we not make our biyabas (guava), bugnay, and alangitngit into a softdrink to compete with Coca Cola? Do you know that alangitngit, an innocent looking vine that turns into a large tree can be made into a nutritious softdrink? I just hope Engr. Marcial Lim will make his formula into commercial production.

No More Agricultural Economics


Nowadays we only have an agricultural economy but no longer an agricultural economics. Agricultural economy means that our agricultural products are the source of money to satisfy our consumer wants. Agricultural economics means that our agricultural products are our source of stability to free us to compete in other products. In agricultural economics it is you who will transform your agricultural raw materials into another kind of product.

We no longer have the cotton plants that Boholanos made into lumpot cloths that was much desired by the Chinese during pre-Spanish times.

The Fatal Flaw

Western civilization is steeped in the Darwinian Theory and Malthusian theory of competition in order to succeed. Orientals, including the Filipinos, are following the Kesler Theory of Mutual Aid and Cooperation in order to succeed.

The Darwinian Theory is taught in western schools and in our schools, but the Kesler Theory is not taught in our schools. So we are at a disadvantage, we do not know what we are!   


Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0
Romans 10:9
"That if you shall confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and shall believe in your heart that God has raised him from the dead, you shall be saved."
👇👇👇
Na-try mo na ba yung Tala app? Reliable sa unexpected expenses at laking tulong sa future! Use this code 9SO1TSL or visit www.tala.com to sign up!

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

princenikkotrade

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
    • www.freewebs.com/princenikkotours
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2007, 09:15:25 AM »
I hope that every municipal mayors have their budget for the agriculturist to have some seminars the moderned  ways to plants for crops and other farm products so they can teach our farmers to use our hectares of land in Bohol.  You know in Cavite, you can see, their farms, they have coconut trees under the trees they  also plants coffee, pineapples, guavas, and other fruits which is very sealable in the market. In Ilocos region you see, their farms they plants, union, ginger, tobaccos, garlics and other crops . You see we have vast of lands uncultivated and our farmers left Bohol to go to Mindanao and other provinces to cultivate farms because they have lack support from our government and I think its not their proirities to help the farmers or I say lack of knowledge and no funds for the agriculture.
I hope you get my points. If only we will help our farmers their we Boholanos will be a  progresive province because we have everything . Sana everybody will think how to help the farmers in Bohol.

Or I hope we can have an organizations, that will have some schoolars to study agriculture and after graduation , they will be hire in the government  and stay or work 5 years toteach the modern ways of farming  before they can apply to work abroad.





Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

Raquelproud boholana

  • LUMINARY
  • ***
  • Posts: 5112
  • mother of 4
    • View Profile
    • farm forum
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2007, 07:52:14 PM »
I think part of the problem why almost nobody farm in Bohol because of lack of goverment support.Our government should take care most of all the farmers need.Kung puro nalang ta serbisyo dili ta mo asenso,what we need nga molambo atong nasud is to produce more goods,more food.Also daghan uncultivated farm sa Bohol kay mahadlok naman sad ang mga land owner mopa farm sa ila yuta kay mahadlok mailog sa nagfarm or if naa man gani ka farm usahay kawaton sad imong abot.Here in U.S grabeh jud ang pagpangga sa goberno sa mga farmers.They have what you called government subsidy.Kung magbaba ang presyo  sa market sa mais or any farm produce ug 50 cent ang goberno ang motapal ug 50 cent para dili maalkanse ang farmer.Plus daghan pud ang farmer diri madawat nga benefit sa goberno.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0
"We may be surprised at the people we find in heaven. God has a soft spot for sinners. His standards are quite low"---Bishop Desmond Tutu


unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

ms da binsi

  • EXECUTIVE
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 24916
  • 2. Atheist and not afraid to burn in hell.
    • View Profile
    • https://twitter.com/daBinsi
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2007, 08:50:26 PM »
Bitaw Raq no? kakita sa sa Iowa to Nebraska sa ilang kamaisan??? sa Cali sa ilang mga utanon ug prutas, grapes ug uban pa???  maibog baya ko ana and i always wondered nga nganong dili man nato na mahimo????

Ug plant and forget man gani bisan kahoy (forest advocate man gyud ko) nganong di man nato matamnan ang atong kabukiran ug kahoy??? something is wrong... sigi sila ug apas sa infrastructure kay naa man silay mabahin ana... Believe me. Kanang uban nga nasod sa Asia giuna man nila ang farm usa ang infastructure, mas daghan man hinuon silang na export dinhi kay sa pilipinas...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

Gervistill

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 316
  • Our on-going projects..
    • View Profile
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2007, 09:21:19 PM »
ive read an article that...

Filipinos pay more for rice, as much as P66 billion, than if they had bought the staple at world-market prices, according to a new World Bank report.

“Since the consumer rice price was 55 percent higher than the border parity price, Filipinos have spent an excessively high percentage of their expenditure on rice,” according to the World Bank said in a report titled “Philippines: Agriculture Public Expenditure Review.” Fifty-five percent is the average gap between domestic and world rice prices....

shame to us who was once a rice exporter, we even host the international rice research institute...and yet we pay for one of the most expensive rice in the world. shame, shame, and shame..






Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0
"  F O R M   follows  F U N C T I O N " is a principle of Modern architecture and industrial design : arch't Louis Sullivan

ms da binsi

  • EXECUTIVE
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 24916
  • 2. Atheist and not afraid to burn in hell.
    • View Profile
    • https://twitter.com/daBinsi
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2007, 09:50:51 PM »
ive read an article that...

Filipinos pay more for rice, as much as P66 billion, than if they had bought the staple at world-market prices, according to a new World Bank report.

“Since the consumer rice price was 55 percent higher than the border parity price, Filipinos have spent an excessively high percentage of their expenditure on rice,” according to the World Bank said in a report titled “Philippines: Agriculture Public Expenditure Review.” Fifty-five percent is the average gap between domestic and world rice prices....

shame to us who was once a rice exporter, we even host the international rice research institute...and yet we pay for one of the most expensive rice in the world. shame, shame, and shame..

Di ka ma shame ana nga sa una ang mga kahumayan gipang bahin man sa mga sa-up, naa bitaw to progam sa una ug unsa to nga nakahinumdom man ko nga ang mga sa-up nga nagtrabaho sa farm for certain years ma iyaha na ang farm??? unya ang sa-up wa may datung ika finance sa uma??? mao nga wa nay nag uma...

Ambot bitaw na unsa na na?




Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

Happy

  • the beauty of nature
  • GURU
  • ****
  • Posts: 9579
  • Ang "Bugon" ni ate Bambi
    • View Profile
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2007, 02:21:12 AM »
wala man daw uwan sa atoa, luoy kuno ang mag-uuma

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0
"There's no perfect life, but we can let God fill it with perfect moments"

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

ms da binsi

  • EXECUTIVE
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 24916
  • 2. Atheist and not afraid to burn in hell.
    • View Profile
    • https://twitter.com/daBinsi
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2007, 02:29:43 AM »
Bali no? maibog kaayu ko sa mga farm diri nga naay sprinkler dagko kaayu...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

Raquelproud boholana

  • LUMINARY
  • ***
  • Posts: 5112
  • mother of 4
    • View Profile
    • farm forum
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2007, 04:43:51 AM »
Isa na sa nakahugno sa agriculture sa Pinas ang kanang gitawag ug Land reform sa DAR(department of agrarian reform) nga gibahin bahin sa mga saup ang humayan ug uban pang gitikad nila nga yuta.Biktima mi ana nga ang kabilin sa among apuhan nga humayan nailog sa nagsaup kay naghinok man diay tong pak an ug file ug papers nga how many years na siya nagwork kono sa humayan.Wala jud mi nahimo adto kay lisod kalabanon ang goberno sa atua.Ingrato pud tong saupa nga unta gibahinan man unta siya ug humay kara ani ug naa pay sweldo.Sakto ka Da binsi nahulog na nuon ug way tanun ang nailog nila nga yuta kay wa may ikakapital ug tanon.Wa jud makalearn ning Pilipinas sa nahitabo sa ubang nasud like Argetina if I am not wrong ingon ana sad land reform program nga ing complain ang mga lumad nga gicapitalize kono sa big foriegn farmer ang yuta so ang solution sa goberno gibahin bahin karon naa ba silay nahimo wala pareha pud sa atua nga empty ang yuta.Maayo pay ang naay ikaafford ang maggunit sa farm kay naa pay matikad ug maabot nga income sa yuta besides manuhol man jud ang tag iya sa yuta ug patamnon ang advantage ani makaproduce pa ug pagkaon plus nakapa employ pa ka sa way mga trabaho.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0
"We may be surprised at the people we find in heaven. God has a soft spot for sinners. His standards are quite low"---Bishop Desmond Tutu


ms da binsi

  • EXECUTIVE
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 24916
  • 2. Atheist and not afraid to burn in hell.
    • View Profile
    • https://twitter.com/daBinsi
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2007, 05:23:03 AM »
Rockz, morag mao nay nakapadaku sa problema sa atoa.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Dagohoy

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2007, 06:21:05 AM »
daghan sa ato mga pinoy mga tapolan. gusto lang
sige ayuda ug hinabang ug pangayo.
bisan kamungay pangayuon nga unta puwede ra
man magtanum sa balay.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

ms da binsi

  • EXECUTIVE
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 24916
  • 2. Atheist and not afraid to burn in hell.
    • View Profile
    • https://twitter.com/daBinsi
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2007, 06:57:04 AM »
mao gyud, ang tapulan magkalisod gyud ug samot. tanom gani ko diri bisan unsa...

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

Gervistill

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 316
  • Our on-going projects..
    • View Profile
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2007, 01:08:49 PM »
Isa na sa nakahugno sa agriculture sa Pinas ang kanang gitawag ug Land reform sa DAR(department of agrarian reform) nga gibahin bahin sa mga saup ang humayan ug uban pang gitikad nila nga yuta.Biktima mi ana nga ang kabilin sa among apuhan nga humayan nailog sa nagsaup kay naghinok man diay tong pak an ug file ug papers nga how many years na siya nagwork kono sa humayan.Wala jud mi nahimo adto kay lisod kalabanon ang goberno sa atua.Ingrato pud tong saupa nga unta gibahinan man unta siya ug humay kara ani ug naa pay sweldo.Sakto ka Da binsi nahulog na nuon ug way tanun ang nailog nila nga yuta kay wa may ikakapital ug tanon.Wa jud makalearn ning Pilipinas sa nahitabo sa ubang nasud like Argetina if I am not wrong ingon ana sad land reform program nga ing complain ang mga lumad nga gicapitalize kono sa big foriegn farmer ang yuta so ang solution sa goberno gibahin bahin karon naa ba silay nahimo wala pareha pud sa atua nga empty ang yuta.Maayo pay ang naay ikaafford ang maggunit sa farm kay naa pay matikad ug maabot nga income sa yuta besides manuhol man jud ang tag iya sa yuta ug patamnon ang advantage ani makaproduce pa ug pagkaon plus nakapa employ pa ka sa way mga trabaho.

mao bitaw pod ni ako na dunggan sa mga ka work nako nga mga taga Negros...tungod sa ila nga land reform. Pero wala pod ko ka tuki hinoon ana nga reform.
Kay sa ako nga analysis pag i divide ang juta mo gamay nalang siya which is dili na pwede ma agri-cultural, ma convert nalang ni siya residential zone.
Kung i tandi nato sa ubang nasod nga ugmad ang ila agriculture, most sa ila argi-cultural farm huge gyud pang commercial. Contrary sa ato nga gamay pa gi bahin-bahin pa.
Usa pod ni sa naka ingon nga ang nag ugmad na tapolan kay, before mo dala siya ug 10 hectares kay 1 hectare nalang. Means we need more manpower to get the same output before..kado nga sayop nga mathematics.


Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0
"  F O R M   follows  F U N C T I O N " is a principle of Modern architecture and industrial design : arch't Louis Sullivan

princenikkotrade

  • STUDENT
  • *
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
    • www.freewebs.com/princenikkotours
Re: Bohol Without Agricultural Economics: Plant and Forget
« Reply #13 on: September 10, 2007, 07:25:16 AM »
Want to share you this message kung tinood sana they have share also there blessings kung matawag nig blessings.  Sa atoa kaha the same kaha ang na enjoy nila? Wa lang ko kahibalo if this is the right place na i post no ? Anyway , if not puede namang idelete..Pero basaha una...para tong wala kahibalo my alam.

 â€œThe perks of being congressman” (thanks to Jane CH)

DAYS before the 14th Congress opened, Budget Secretary Rolando Andaya Jr. had humored the neophyte members of the House of Representatives about the enviable perks enjoyed by lawmakers. The former representative of Camarines Sur who once chaired the powerful House appropriations committee was invited to orient the first-term legislators on the budgeting process. During his talk, he remarked how wonderful it is to be a congressman: "You have flexible time. Pwede kang pumasok, pwedeng hindi (You may or may not go to work) yet still get your salary." 

Then, he warned them not to make the mistake of paying for meals and drinks at the Batasan Pambansa's South Lounge as it is their privilege to be served free food.

Andaya may have meant everything as a joke, only that speaking of the privileges that legislators enjoy in such manner was hardly amusing, especially given a quorum-challenged legislature that has been passing fewer and fewer laws each year despite the ever increasing budgetary allocation to lawmaking. When the 13th Congress formally closed last June 30, it managed to pass only 148 laws , setting a new record-low in the history of the Philippine legislature. That is no laughing matter.

Yet apparently, the mention of perks was the very cue Jose de Venecia Jr. had also waited for. When came his turn to give the freshman legislators a briefing, the just elected House Speaker announced even more entitlements for members of the Lower House, in particular, an annual P1-million foreign travel allotment, and allocations for additional staff and maintenance of their respective district offices. There's even a new building in the works to house new offices for the congressmen.

What the public commonly knows is that his or her district representative gets a monthly salary of P35,000, plus, of course, yearly pork-barrel allocations amounting to P70 million -- P20 million in Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) and P50 million as congressional allocation for public works projects.

What is seldom known are the amounts corresponding to their other entitlements, apart from salary and pork barrel. As gleaned from the Commission on Audit's annual published itemized lists, these include expenses for district staff allocation, contractual consultants, research, consultative local travel, communication, and supplies. There are also allocations for a public affairs fund, central office staff, equipment/furniture and fixtures, and other maintenance and operating expenses (MOE).

COSTLY CONGRESSMEN
What the Public Spent for the Upkeep of Each Member
of the House of Representatives in 2005
 
EXPENSE ITEMS*
 AMOUNT
 
Basic Salary
 420,000.00
  
Foreign Travel
 220,867.70
 
District Staff Allocation
 650,000.04
 
Contractual Consultants
 120,000.00

 
Research
 396,000.00
 
Consultative Local Travel
 788,763.71

 
Communication
 129,600.00
 
Supplies
 120,000.00
 
Public Affairs Fund
 308,400.00
 
Central Office Staff
 1,982,033.58
 
Equipment/Furniture and Fixtures
 21,537.84
 
Other MOE
 600,000.00
 
Source: Commission on Audit
*Figures for Foreign Travel, Consultative Local Travel, Central Office Staff and Equipment/Furniture and Fixtures are average amounts. The rest are uniform for all congressmen.

The COA lists are not at all comprehensive and do not even include expenses of legislators as committee members and officers which, in 2005, amounted to over P92 million. In 2004, the House spent about P77 million on these expenses.

Data from the PCIJ book, The Rulemakers, show that the annual upkeep of each congressman had almost doubled from P2.83 million in 1994 to P5.16 million in 2002. Latest data culled from the published expenses of the 13th House point to a continuing trend, with the annual upkeep pegged at P5.7 million each congressman in 2005, or P480, 880.36 a month -- the highest to date.

COSTLY CONGRESSMEN - 2
Annual and Monthly Upkeep of Each Member of the House of Representatives
 
YEAR
 ANNUAL UPKEEP
 MONTHLY UPKEEP
 
 
1994
 2,830,608.48
 235,884.04
 
 
1995
 2,588,929.44
 215,744.12
 
 
1996
 3,235,886.71
 269,657.23
 
 
1997
 3,496,225.83
 291,352.15
 
 
1998
 2,827,975.56
 235,664.63
 
 
1999
 4,537,482.57
 378,123.55
 
 
2000
 4,562,446.31
 380,203.86
 
 
2001
 3,917,321.63
 326,443.47
 
 
2002
 5,155,221.54
 429,601.79
 
 
2004
 4,112,520.42
 342,710.04
 
 
2005
 5,770,564.32
 480,880.36
 
 
Source: Commission on Audit

While there has not been any increase in their basic salary since 1999, and most of the other entitlements have remained at their 2001 levels, each House member's district staff allocation has been increased to P650,000 annually. MOE also ballooned to P600,000 in 2005 from the previous year's P411,000. Meanwhile, expenses on consultative local travel and central office staff were at their highest in the same year at over P788,000 and close to P2 million, respectively, per congressman.


Foreign travel expenses in 2005 also was double the 2004 amount at an average of P221,000 each House member. The total bill paid for by the government for the overseas trips of 170 congressmen was P59,413,412. 82.

 
COSTLY CONGRESSMEN - 3
Annual Average Amounts Paid to Foreign Travel of Members
of the House of Representatives
 
YEAR
 AMOUNT
 
 
 
1994
 98,444.80
 
 
1995
 89,948.98
 
 
1996
 187,176.33
 
 
1997
 184,458.69
 
 
1998
 156,475.83
 
 
1999
 372,988.06
 
 
2000
 432,950.16
 
 
2001
 254,395.86
 
 
2002
 316,201.67
 
 
2004
 110,129.44
 
 
2005
 220,867.70
 
 
Source: Commission on Audit


THE HOUSE JETSET*
Top 10 Spenders on Foreign Travel Among Members
of the House of Representatives in 2005
 
CONGRESSMAN
 EXPENSES
 
 
 
Antonio Cuenco
 1,294,058.05
 
 
Roque Ablan Jr.
 1,014,006.90
 
 
Monico Puentevella
 960,789.66
 
 
Emilio Espinosa Jr.
 806,904.43
 

Ernesto Nieva
 795,350.89
 
Juan Miguel Zubiri
 787,582.99
 
Abdullah Dimaporo
 777,886.88
 
Hermilando Mandanas
 741,172.72
 
 
Arnulfo Fuentebella
 733,777.65
 
Reylina Nicolas
 731,196.5
  

Source: Commission on Audit

* List does not declare the foreign travel expenses of House Speaker Jose de Venecia.

Because maintenance, operating, and other expenses of House members are consolidated with their basic salary in the payroll and classified as "outright expenses," these are no longer subject to liquidation, which means that congressmen do not have to account for these funds.

What's more, as reported in The Rulemakers:

They are not expected to submit a payroll of their district staff or report their function, salaries and withholding taxes. No one starts asking if they do not produce a report on the research their offices should supposedly undertake. There is no demand for them to produce the list of consultants they have hired, as well as the contracts they draw up for those whose services they need. As fas as the current (lack of) rules go, how the legislators spend their public affairs fund is their business and business alone.

The generous perks do not end there. The House Speaker is himself a source of funds with a vast discretionary largesse at his disposal. From this are mostly drawn the representatives' monthly allowances (which can range from P50,000 to P100,000), Christmas bonuses (P100,000 to 200,000), as well as the "payoffs" for votes during speakership contests and "appearance fees" (P50,000 as minimum) for attending plenary sessions to vote on crucial national bills.

Under de Venecia, who has won an unprecedented fifth term as Speaker, the 14th House is not likely to veer away from the usual practice. Isn't it high time that the public demanded greater financial accountability from their representatives?

Posted by Alecks P. Pabico in Governance at 09:48 | Comments (31) | Trackbacks (0)



 

.



.



__,_._,___



Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=3894.0

unionbank online loan application low interest, credit card, easy and fast approval

Tags: