Daily Bible Verse

Provided by Christianity.com Bible Search

CLICK THE IMAGE BELOW for ALL YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS
trip travel coupon discounts

Author Topic: Oral Defamation and Slander Against Public Officials  (Read 216 times)

MikeLigalig.com

  • FOUNDER
  • Webmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 34030
  • Please use the share icons below
    • View Profile
    • Book Your Tickets on a Budget
Oral Defamation and Slander Against Public Officials
« on: March 23, 2025, 06:32:30 PM »

The Supreme Court emphasized that statements against public officers do not constitute oral defamation or slander when these concern their discharge of official duties —unless done maliciously.
 
In a Decision written by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, the Supreme Court’s Second Division acquitted an accused of oral defamation for remarks against a barangay kagawad.


The barangay kagawad was walking past the accused’s house, when she yelled from her house’s terrace that the barangay kagawad was uneducated, ignorant, and biased against the accused in their barangay conciliation proceedings. The remarks were heard by many people as the terrace was beside the highway.


Under Article 358 of the Revised  Penal Code, there is oral defamation or slander when (1) there is an allegation of a crime, fault, or flaw; (2) made orally; (3) publicly; (4) maliciously; (5) towards a person, alive or dead; and (6) such allegation tends to cause dishonor on the person defamed.
 
As the law assumes that a defamatory allegation is malicious, or made with knowledge that it is false, the person who made the defamatory remarks has the burden of proving there was no malice.
 
However, when it comes to defamation against public officers in relation to their duties, the prosecution has the burden to prove there was actual malice in the defamatory remarks. The Court recognizes that the right to free speech empowers citizens to hold public officers accountable because public office is a public trust.


In the present case, the SC said that the prosecution failed to prove there was malice in the accused’s remarks against the barangay kagawad. It stressed that while the statements may be offensive, they are not actionable by themselves: “Being ‘sensitive’ has no place in this line of service."


Read the full press release at: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-statements-against-public-officers-not-slanderous-when-related-to-the-performance-of-official-duties/


Read the full text of the Decision at: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/246824-argelyn-m-labargan-vs-people-of-the-philippines/


#SupremeCourtPH

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=126171.0
John 3:16-18 ESV
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son (Jesus Christ), that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.

👉 GET travel tickets, hotel rooms and all travel needs at www.klook.com

GROW YOUR MONEY FASTER than bank deposits at www.coins.ph

CLICK THE IMAGE BELOW for ALL YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS
trip travel coupon discounts

Tags:
 

CLICK THE IMAGE BELOW for ALL YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS
trip travel coupon discounts