Buildings of permanent structure are always classified as immovable.
- It is immaterial whether it is built on a rented or owned land.
- The nature of the building as property does not depend on the way the parties deal with it (see: Leung Yee vs. Strong Machinery Co. 37 Phil 664.]
- Buildings are considered immovable provided they are more or less of a permanent structure, substantially adhering to the land, and not mere superimpositions (ex. of superimpositions are barong-barong, Quonset fixtures)
- A dismantled building or house and/or the materials of such dismantled house should be regarded as personal properties (see: Biscerra vs. Tenezz, 11-29-62,1, L-16218).
Book online travel tickets in Asia, Australia and New Zealand at:
https://12go.asia/?z=3467325Linkback:
https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=91281.0
Topic: Buildings of permanent structure are always classified as immovable (Read 466 times)