Another proof that 2 = 1
I got it Slack.
At the begining it is already wrong because a simple equation should consist of one variable and one constant like A=2 or X = 3, a variable should not be equal to another variable. You may say that a variable is equal to a square of another variable.
In the 2nd to the last line 2(a-x) = a-x (since a = x as the first line, so you may substitute a with x)
So the equation will become 2(a-a) = a-a
Then, 2 (0) = 0
Then, 0 = 0
Conclusion: Our universe is bounded by equations. This means that there's no fixed equation and anything may happen, may change without warning. The universe is unpredictable.
Perhaps the most interesting equation is the Chaos or Butterfly effect (finalized and published by Edward Lorenz in 1961). Initially this theory is not accepted but now, it is widely used in vast fields such as aviation, weather pattern, logistics, production/demand..etc.:
The butterfly effect is a phrase which encapsulates the more technical notion of sensitive dependence on initial conditions in chaos theory. Small variations of the initial condition of a nonlinear dynamical system may produce large variations in the long term behavior of the system. So this is sometimes presented as esoteric behavior, but can be exhibited by very simple systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill might roll into any of several valleys depending on slight differences in initial position.
The phrase refers to the idea that a butterfly's wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that ultimately cause a tornado to appear (or prevent a tornado from appearing). The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events leading to large-scale phenomena. Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the system might have been vastly different.
Recurrence, the approximate return of a system towards its initial conditions, together with sensitive dependence on initial conditions are the two main ingredients for chaotic motion. They have the practical consequence of making complex systems, such as the weather, difficult to predict past a certain time range (approximately a week in the case of weather).
Sensitive dependence on initial conditions was first described in the literature by Jacques Hadamard in 1890[1] and popularized by Pierre Duhem's 1906 book. The idea that one butterfly could have a far-reaching ripple effect on subsequent events seems first to have appeared in a 1952 short story by Ray Bradbury about time travel (see Popular Media below), although the term "butterfly effect" itself is related to the work of Edward Lorenz. In 1961, Lorenz was using a numerical computer model to rerun a weather prediction, when, as a shortcut on a number in the sequence, he entered the decimal .506 instead of entering the full .506127 the computer would hold. The result was a completely different weather scenario.[2] Lorenz published his findings in a 1963 paper for the New York Academy of Sciences noted that "One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a seagull's wings could change the course of weather forever." Later speeches and papers by Lorenz used the more poetic butterfly. According to Lorenz, upon failing to provide a title for a talk he was to present at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1972, Philip Merilees concocted Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas as a title.
Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=7932.0
