MikeLigalig.com

there's no doubt, manay, that these radicals are a threat to world's security just as they also think US and other Western Nations are to them. there's a huge mistrust between the two.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

I agree that the current situation in Pakistan is quite alarming. Considering the rising islamofascism in that region of the world.

However, though Islamabad is nuclear armed, it would be suicide if it ever launched a nuke towards Israel. Because Israel is, also, nuclear-armed.

The Pakistanis do not have the technology for thermo nukes, they have mini atomb bombs or 1st class hydrogen bomb technology. The nuclear technology they received was through the Chinese, which is of direct Russian technology.

Considering the fact that Pakistan and China are military and economic allies. Their common threat is India. And China's offering of nuclear technology ot Pakistan was in other words a 'containment' policy the Chinese have with a growing India.

Israel, back to picture of analysis, hehe, isn't weak. Its the strongest power in the middle east, second only to the United States. And Israel has thermo nuclear capability, provided for by the USA, of course.

If, theroetically, Pakistan or Iran would so as much as launch a mini atom warhead towards Israel, Israel would unleash its continuum of ICBMs over Pakistan or Iran, and glass every single inch of that country.

Are the Pakistanis and Iranians that serious to condemn their people? To risk deaths of millions of their own? To hear the cries and wailings of innocents? Its up to them.

Israel, as a strategic military ally of the United States, would receive a quick and prompt American response , if it was attacked. The United States would maintain its M.A.D policy, an attack on American ally with a nuke, is considered an attack on the United States itself. American would obliterate Iran-Pakistan with a volley of 10-20 thermo nukes.

There would be no more Pakistan or Iran.



Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

Good analysis, Glace.

What is important for us to take consideration is the American maintenance of the Monroe Doctrine. One can colloquially refer to it as the 'Big Stick Policy'. It basically surmises that all lands in the Western Hemisphere, North, Central and South America are free from foreign power intervention, at the prejudice of American interests, of course.

The United States has fixed interests in the security and stability of the Central and South American nation/states as it directly and indirectly influences and affects American strategic interests. Economic and military.

Cuba was a territory that was won over by the United States from the Spanish in 1898 in the Spanish-American War. In good faith, the United States granted Cuba independence.

It was of national prerogative to prevent an island state like Cuba from acquiring nuclear power and posing a threat to the belly of these United States. Specially not a nation like Cuba, whose population is not even equivalent to the state of New Jersey.

America challenged Kruschev-led USSR on the dismantling of the missile silo. If Krushev maintained his course, it would have meant a nuclear war between the two giant powers; USA and USSR. If Krushev acquiesced to Kennedy's demands, it would have settled the situation and prevent a nuclear war.

Krushev did acquiesced. And his acquiescence is regarded by political scientits and Military Historians as the beginning of the final chapter of the Cold War. America claimed pre-eminence and the USSR's buckling to American demands was seen as a sign of weakness.

Culminating in the collapse of the USSR in 1991, altogether.

The American Eagle's Outstretched in Triumph.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

lol, all of that was a ploy by the Regan Administration under the veneer of 'Reganomics' as a way for the Russians to continue on digging their own grave.

The United States spent on military defense year after year knowing full well that the Russians would try to imitiate such spending so as to never fall behind the US's military capability. As a capitalist state and with a burgeoning economy, the United States could afford its military policy.

Russia, on the other hand, was suffering gaping protests in East Germany, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, Kazakh regions, as well as a massive economic deficit from its catastrophic military theater in Afghanistan, which cost the Russians billions of dollars and thousands of lives for a failed attempt to secure a southern Port.

The United States never really had a 'Star Wars' project, it was all a ploy, which the Ruskies believed all too well.

It worked, fortunately, to our advantage, as it led to the ultimate capitulation of the USSR due to the massive economic failure in that Communist Empire.

The Russian aggressive nature, a Bolshevik trait, was the ultimate reason for its collapse. Nikita Krushev once opined to the US House of Congress in his state visit to the United State sin 1963, "WE WILL BURRY YOU!"



Instead, The USSR buried its own self. America provided the shovel. Colloquially, speaking.



Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

As of recently, there were hackers trying to hack into the US Pentagon to steal files on the US's JF-35 fighter plans as well as upgrades on the FA-22 Raptor.

In this current economic malaise, the US as well as the EU are in danger of islamofascist threats that would take advantage of the current situation.

Take for example Europe. The ancestral homeland of the Caucasian Race, is now under attack of islamofascists that wont even assimilate to the prevailing culture of the land.

Who still refer to Christian Europe and Christian generals as people 'worthy to be decapiated by Islam'.

IMHO, there is no dialogue with these people. Dialogue is impossible with such closed minded rationality. Xenophobic theocratic totalitarianists.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

haha, interesting.

Are you in support of the revival of the CIA's silencing programs?

Glace, you sound more of a republican every day.





Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

hahaha. i don't know if i am. my views are very limited.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

then you will discover if i'm a pony or an elephant hahahhaa...blue or red.

hmmm.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0

i am i think moderate.

Linkback: https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=19250.0