Who in the entire world is charged of contempt of court because he was protesting against abortion?
Who in the entire world, uses colloquial license as an excuse, to mend up obvious grammatical and logical error?
Who in the entire world, picks up cases from nowhere, just because the claim of the defendant, is that he was only exercising his right to self expression even if he was actually invading privacy rights and such a case has even no bearing to the discussion on religion and the freedom of expression (as one expresses his political and social views on religion)?
Linkback:
https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=18352.0