iii. hands down. why? because there is no law in any land that any accused cannot cross-examine any dog. it is not the dog's fault that he speaks another language. it is up to the interested cross-examiner to learn the dog's language. on second thoughts, can an accused cross-examine? i thought an accused depends on his defense lawyer for that. now, any defense lawyer worth his salt should start learning dog language...
Linkback:
https://tubagbohol.mikeligalig.com/index.php?topic=79158.0